In at least one instance, parking nodes were spammed in an area rather than using a parking area. Changeset has been reverted in part or full.

Good catch. Make sure you report this golf vandal to DWG.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150730858

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change/add/edit/delete, and why?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150674651

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change/add/edit/delete, and why?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150676011

These buildings are very rough...

What's up with not adding cartpaths over the water as a bridge?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150660275

Again, do not fold areas back upon themselves to simulate a hole. I have commented on multiple changesets where you made this error and corrected them for you, but you have continued to make this error and have not responded to those changeset comments.

I will soon gave no choice but to again escalate this to the DWG.

Do not try to mimic holes for your golf game.

Changeset reverted in part or full.

Again, please do not map things so they should up a certain way for your golf game.

Do not fold areas back upon themselves to simulate holes. multipolygon relations should be used instead.

This changeset has been reverted in part or full.

Please do not map areas such that they fold back upon themselves to create a "hole" in the area. Multipolygon relations should be used instead.

Please do not overlap building areas.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150513994

Do you have a source for the proposed freeway interchange? Has construction begun?

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. Access tags should be used instead to control access. Deletion is not the answer, and you can read why here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/150420016

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. Access tags should be used instead to control access. Deletion is not the answer, and you can read why here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/150420016

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. Access tags should be used instead to control access. Deletion is not the answer, and you can read why here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/150420016

Why did you delete all these features?

This changeset should be reverted due to vanadlism and mass deletion.

Please use more detailed changeset comments than "Updated". What did you change and why?

Why did you delete these features?

Again, you are deleting features with no discussion, and no details in your changeset comments.

Please immediately explain why you are deleting these features beyond "Updated", or again, this changeset will be reverted due to vandalism.

What is your reason for deleting all these features? This is not the first time you have just deleted all these features that were properly mapped and it looks like vandalism.

Please more descriptive than "Updated", especially when mass-deleting features, and explain why you are mass-deleting these features.

Reverted changeset due to mass deletion. Please do not delete features when they still exist and are mapped correctly.

changeset/150371707