OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
150654289

Again, do not fold areas back upon themselves to simulate a hole. I have commented on multiple changesets where you made this error and corrected them for you, but you have continued to make this error and have not responded to those changeset comments.

I will soon gave no choice but to again escalate this to the DWG.

150638491

Do not try to mimic holes for your golf game.

Changeset reverted in part or full.

150638750

Again, please do not map things so they should up a certain way for your golf game.

Do not fold areas back upon themselves to simulate holes. multipolygon relations should be used instead.

This changeset has been reverted in part or full.

150638329

Please do not map areas such that they fold back upon themselves to create a "hole" in the area. Multipolygon relations should be used instead.

150513994

Please do not overlap building areas.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150513994

146634751

Do you have a source for the proposed freeway interchange? Has construction begun?

150413200

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. Access tags should be used instead to control access. Deletion is not the answer, and you can read why here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/150420016

150413009

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. Access tags should be used instead to control access. Deletion is not the answer, and you can read why here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/150420016

150412602

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. Access tags should be used instead to control access. Deletion is not the answer, and you can read why here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/150420016

150401140

Why did you delete all these features?

This changeset should be reverted due to vanadlism and mass deletion.

150401060

Please use more detailed changeset comments than "Updated". What did you change and why?

Why did you delete these features?

150400835

Again, you are deleting features with no discussion, and no details in your changeset comments.

Please immediately explain why you are deleting these features beyond "Updated", or again, this changeset will be reverted due to vandalism.

150400576

What is your reason for deleting all these features? This is not the first time you have just deleted all these features that were properly mapped and it looks like vandalism.

Please more descriptive than "Updated", especially when mass-deleting features, and explain why you are mass-deleting these features.

150364405

Reverted changeset due to mass deletion. Please do not delete features when they still exist and are mapped correctly.

changeset/150371707

150364561

Reverted changeset due to mass deletion. Please do not delete features when they still exist and are mapped correctly.

changeset/150371705

150364803

Reverted changeset due to mass deletion. Please do not delete features when they still exist and are mapped correctly.

changeset/150371699

150321634

Individual trees should be mapped as nodes, not tiny woods.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150321634

150229273

Why did you delete these features?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150229273

150232828

Again, do not delete and readd features. This causes the loss of history for the various features. Further edits doing the same thing (without a response from you) will result in escalation to the DWG for assistance.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150232828

150180578

Do not partially overlap areas.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150180578