You are still mapping such that landcovers are partially overlapping. I have mentioned this numerous times before, and directed you to the relevant wiki page. Please stop this practice.

Awesome. Thanks. I noticed by total sheer randomness. The nodes looked funny so I just had to investigate. lol.

:D

node/5925549448

node/1899574577

Not labeled as a bus stop.

What's up with adding wikidata to all the nodes of the PHX Skytrain, rather than just the ways?

Access tags for private driveways should be used instead of straight-up deletion of the way.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147925006

This house does not exist.

way/809251492

Was any in-person verification or survey actually performed?

Any update?

Name seems sus.

Only features that currently exist should be mapped. Segments over roadways where the rails have been completely removed have been removed. Segments in trees where existence cannot be confirmed were left.

railway=razed#:~:text=Mapping%20a%20feature%20without%20any%20physical%2C%20verifiable%20presence%20(Good%20practice%23Map%20what%27s%20on%20the%20ground)%20is%20considered%20out%20of%20scope%20for%20OSM

railway=abandoned#:~:text=mapping%20of%20non%2Dexistent%20railways%20as%20incorrect

They reverted your changeset, so it will need to be changed back, again.

changeset/147321589

ImJohn55, please stop. We know you are Bvonter23 based off of your IP and MAC address.

I'm on the fence about it. I removed it for now. Looks like it could be a ferry terminal, but idk, pier is good enough for now.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147224833

You should not remove features just because they are private. Access tags should be used instead.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147313689

Please do not make changes just for your golf game. Mapping for the renderer is not allowed on OSM.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147307736

Why did you change these parking lots to underground buildings? What is the reason for this changeset?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147307510

Please do not simulate holes like how you have done,

Please read:
leisure=golf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.

This changeset has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead to restrict access, rather than deleting the features all together. You can read why it won't be deleted here: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/147280635

This changeset has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead to restrict access, rather than deleting the features all together. You can read why it won't be deleted here: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/147280635

ugh.... Do not add roads as a completely wrong classification just for your silly golf game.

please do not map for the renderer by adding things that don't exist...

Feel free to close the note once you resolve it. In this case, you added the building, so good enough for the note.