OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
146078455

Do not partially overlap landcovers. The fairway and green should not overlap. I have gone through and fixed this error.

Please review the following to avoid other common mistakes.
leisure=golf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146078455

146052623

Do not map things for test purposes on the live OSM map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146052623

146052670

Do not map things for test purposes on the live OSM map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146052670

146013392

This should not have been deleted. Access=private should have been applied instead. This is to prevent someone from completely readding it. If we tag it as private, then people will know it is added, etc.

I have reverted this changeset to readd it, and have added the private access tag instead.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146013392

146011152

What's up with consistently not adding the golfcart paths as a bridge over water? Like why end your cartpaths so abruptly?

I have fixed these for you, and have cleaned up other mistakes.

146012018

Why did you change the parking lot to a building?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146012018

118799796

Where did you get the addresses from?

145974950

Do not add water features where water is already correctly mapped. This changeset has been reverted in part or full.

145975605

Please do not delete features just to readd them. Revision history is lost.

osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

In the future, please just make the changes to the features that already exist, rather then deleting and creating a replacement item.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145975605

145931651

'Just because it is private does not mean it should be deleted. I have gone ahead and reverted this changeset.

Feel free to take a read here on why we won'"'"'t delete features:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

changeset/145972288

131084077

Hello,

OSM is what is on the ground. I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding historical features, but that type of data belongs on OHM (Open Historical Maps):
https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/

Historical features do not belong on OSM if they no longer exist. In this case, lines tagged as historic=road where no road exists anymore (or recently) belongs on OSM.

osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

I have gone ahead and removed these no longer existing features. I encourage you to instead add these features on OHM.

95591027

This changeset has been reverted. Please ensure you are following the guidelines and standards for adding features.

changeset/145899306

141694100

This changeset has been reverted. Please ensure you are following the guidelines and standards for adding features.

changeset/145899306

145896818

Do not incorrectly map parking lots as buildings. Ensure you are using the correct tags.

I have reverted/changed the features in this changeset in part or full.

145895967

When mapping golf carts, do not overlap existing roadways. I have removed or reverted this changeset in full or part.

145896818

Buildings can be squared using "q".

145784201

Please do not delete then readd features. There is significant interest in preserving the history of the features.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145784201

145787033

This CS resolves duplicate tagging of multipolygons.

145752386

Removed cuisine=mexican tag in CS:

changeset/145780557

145261200

Do not delete features just to readd it. You should instead edit the features that already exist.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145261200