These railway features do not exist (at least anymore). These no longer existing features should be added to OpenHistoricalMaps where it can live on forever. OHM is designed for historical features.

Since these "abandoned/razed" railways gave been completely removed, they should not be added to OSM. These ways should be removed, and instead be added to OHM.

osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#:~:text=Place%20where%20railway,can%20be%20mapped.

Do not create "fake" holes by "lollipopping" areas. Multi-polygon relations should be used instead...

Do not map areas such that they partially overlap. The green should either not overlap with the fairway or it should be wholly within the fairway. I have gone ahead and fixed it, but - please be more careful of this in the future.

Partial overlaps throw all sorts of error flags, thus requiring more scrutiny.

Looks good!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141357041

Additionally, after reviewing your previous changesets, I have already asked you to use better changeset comments.

Please use better changeset comments. What did you change and why? Good changeset comments are important. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

Please use better changeset comments. What did you change and why? Good changeset comments are important. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

Please use better changeset comments. What did you change and why? Good changeset comments are important. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

Please use better changeset comments. What did you change and why? Good changeset comments are important. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

Also, the water area is not a water hazard. Tags should not be falsely added for a game or renderer.

Do not create "holes" by lollipopping the area, such as what you did on Hole 9. I have fixed this for you.

Do not partially overlap areas. I have fixed this. Please take a look so you understand how to do it in the future.

Also, do not partially overlap areas (as you have done for the green and fairway). They should either not overlap at all, or the smaller area should be wholly within the larger area.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141362853

Please use more constructive changeset comments. What did you change? Why? Etc.?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141362853

Land covers should not partially overlap. (as you did with the fairways and greens). The areas should either not overlap at all, or the smaller one should be wholly within the larger area.

Additionally, do not "lollipop" areas by creating "holes" with thin extensions to create a fake hole.

I have corrected the errors. Avoid this in the future. Feel free to take a look at the changes to understand how it should be mapped.

Do not add features that partially overlap. This throws error flags. They should either not overlap, or one area should be wholly within the other.

I have resolved this. Please avoid this in the future.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141176971

Areas should not be partially overlapping. The smaller area should be fully within the other, or they should not overlap. Partial overlaps generate error flags since the database does not know which is the "top" area.

I have corrected this. Please observe and avoid doing this in the future.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141139381

Landcovers should not partially overlap, as you have done with the fairways and golf greens. The smaller area should be fully within the other, OR they should not overlap at all.

I have corrected this to resolve OSM error flags.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141112481

Landcovers should not overlap as you have done with the fairways and greens. They ahould either not overlap at all, or one should be drawn completely within the other.

This will need to be addressed as the way it has been done creates an error with the database.

I highly recommend you attempt to fix it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140694977

What does "tarry" mean in your changeset comment? What did you change/alter in this changeset? Please use more detailed changeset comments.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140695381