Do not add fictitious cartpaths, around parking lots, such as:

way/1020321420

All or part of this changeset has been reverted.

Thanks for adding all the names and trails. I'm going to close out all the notes in the area regarding the trails that you named.

Thank you. I reported the user yesterday to the DWG for the exact changesets that you reverted.

I know it does. I do my best to use the feature, but I wish it would break it up by segment so the user doesn't have to constantly do two breaks at each underpass/overpass. I'm sure a lot of new users aren't breaking it up either.

I understand the capabilities of SC, just ya know, I feel that it can be tweaked a little. Oh well.

Good point. I try to break it best as I can when able, but StreetComplete really needs to add it in and do it automatically.

Thanks for the heads up.

Do not add things that don't exist. Removed and reverted.

Do not add things that don't exist. Removed and reverted.

Do not add things incorrectly. This is just a driveway, not a cartpath, and definitely not with that name.

way/1186449218

Is not a golf hole....

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

I don't think it is the first time this user has done it. Also, their changesets of "yes" are not very helpful. I've commented on their changesets previously, to no avail.

As I have mentioned before, please use more detailed changeset comments. Instead of "Yes", can you put what you changed and why?

More details on good changeset comments can be found here:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

Sounds like the on/off ramps might be open?

https://www.news.iowadot.gov/newsandinfo/2023/03/bridge-replacement-on-polk-county-road-f-22ne-126th-avenue-over-i-35-begins-wednesday-march-29.html#:~:text=Drivers%20may%20find%20that%20the%20north%2D%20and%20southbound%20I%2D35%20ramps%20at%20Exit%2096%20may%20be%20open%20at%20times%20depending%20on%20the%20work%20taking%20place.

The changeset was reverted since these paths/trails are visible from aerial imagery. Access tags should be used instead rather than just deleting them.

Please do not delete trails/paths just because they are on private property.

For more on why these should be mapped, read here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t

changeset/137967523

What exactly are you testing?

Please do not "lollipop" areas. Specifically, you are adding in little areas to punch a hole, rather than using a multirelation if you must. I've gone through and corrected it here and on other golf courses.

Is that road still under construction on I-75?

Can you elaborate on your changeset comment? What did you do, why, etc.?

I would be more than happy to take a look.

Access tags should be used rather than mass-deleting features which clearly exist.

You can read more here on why they should be mapped:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/137710101

Reverted changeset. Do not delete large chunks of a lake and incorrectly make it a water hazard for golf.

changeset/137709817