Hi Ctwemmy, welcome to OSM and thank you for your contributions. I am flagging two minor issues with this changeset:

The cycleway (way/1121942427) that you have edited still has the "planned:highway" key, which can be deleted now that you have given it a "highway" value.

Also it looks like you have accidentally dragged the address point node for 40A Taniwha Street (node/5485725056)

Cheers
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137911133

This belongs in a 'description' tag, not in the name tag. Probably the sports field has no name suitable for the name tag.

See osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136679196

Hi TinTin, the value for building:material you set to "bricks", should be "brick"
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136235902

Hi Colemagoo welcome to OSM, thank you for your contribution. Your updates look good, you have correctly set the tags to reflect the paths are closed.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136235279

Hi TinTin, welcome to OSM editing, thank you for your contributions.
The `surface` tag is intended for the surface of highways (roads, tracks, paths). For a building, the tag you are looking for is `building:material`

Check the OSMWiki it is the reference for tags: building:material=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136208088

Hi, Selwyn College is already mapped as an area: way/27034179

So adding the school point is not required and becomes a duplicate feature. Can you please delete the point you added?

Thanks

No worries, that does explain it: the original POIs are quite new, only added 28 days ago. I'll do some clean up of the dupes. Cheers

Hi Omnific, thanks for adding more retail POIs in Waiheke Island. However I noticed that several of these are duplicates of existing features (eg Out There, Chances and True Blue)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135760664

Hi Sucl, the driveway should just be drawn as a single line, not as an area. It does not need a name tag
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135697181

Please do no put address numbers in the name tag. No name tag is needed on houses
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135698674

Rainbow's End is already mapped as way/29418232/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135694094

Welcome to OSM, thanks for your edit adding the grass area. Only specifically named features need a 'name' tag (like the Old Government House Lawn). This area does not have a specific name, so it should not have a name tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135180855

Hey Kyle, I'm curious if you're using an imagery source for this changeset, or schematic plans, or have you surveyed the area? Specifically for the new section of shared path between Hudson Rd and Te Honohono ki tai - I can't see this in any imagery layers I use. Way: 1160808656

Thanks for adding the driveways, but please don't give them unnecessary names
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134514929

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your contribution. This feature doesn't actually need a name of 'parking aisle', as it is already described by the other tags. You can delete the name key.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134489299

This should be tagged leisure=swimming_pool. See this example at a neighbouring property: way/614528341
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133851212

Hi HaoYue, welcome to OpenStreetMap editing. I wonder, was this part of a university assignment?

I have reviewed your changes. I can see that all of the features you have created already existed on the map. I have reverted your changes. Please take care not to duplicate features which already exist.

Thanks

Welcome to OSM editing. Unfortunately the quality of this changeset was not great - many accidental changes, and re-mapping of existing features. I have reverted it with changeset/133771437
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133693603

I don't think it really matters - but technically Glenvar Road damage was from the January 27 flooding

Thanks for taking the time, I appreciate it. I think in the case of Ponsonby (like many suburbs) it's impossible to pinpoint a single perceived centre - and I accept people are likely to differ on this - but I do think that the location over the community centre building at 20 Ponsonby Terrace provides a nice balance representing the centre of "Ponsonby the residential suburb to the west of Ponsonby Rd, north of Richmond Rd", and "Ponsonby the retail/commercial strip along Ponsonby Road". And it does help it's the location of the Ponsonby Community Centre building.

So yes I will move it back there now, but I will try stop considering geographical centres and cartographic labelling when working with place nodes - I appreciate the logic for using perceived centres as best practice.

Cheers