way/1082798744 - completely circular cricket pitch does not agree with imagery or on the ground survey.

Similar issues have been introduced with way/1082798746

way/230955659 - This is clearly a building in bing; but as of this changeset, no longer.

Again, if you aren't in the area, perhaps don't make modifications that disagree with imagery.

If you aren't actively surveying on the ground; in this area, don't delete buildings that you can *see in imagery*.

Revert your changeset and correct rather than delete.
Its not that hard to avoid being abrasive.

Be aware as well of the offset. In ID, hit B (Background), and drag the control for offset until the roads and buildings all align.
Chances are; what might look like it has a bad offset right now aligns fairly well.

way/1042811149 isn't abandoned railway, it's completely removed. The only trace remaining is a path, which is mapped separately.

Ah! Might need to pop a few access=permissive tags then, at the moment many show up as just public.

With a number of these, it looked like private land from the roadside. Is that the case? (not on trailforks, etc)

Nice work - very accurate :)

Shows up on Maxar

Hi, thanks for fleshing out some detail :)

I've also linked in your wikipedia page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwood_International_High_School

Ah, thanks!

An example of something which isn't fixed still: this is not a residential road (955212127, v1)

Oh, nice work :)

If your focus is on buildings, you might be interested in mapwith.ai; where it will give you some suggested building outlines based on Bing imagery. Still have to check things carefully; and compare to other imagery just incase something has been knocked down since; but it can be a timesaver :)

This appears to be a driveway, and isn't publicly accessible. Please check your mapping instructions and discuss with your team mates.

way/955772782 Also a driveway, not an unclassified road

way/955680242 is a driveway; not a public road.

Nice work on the buildings!

You need to stop removing this trail.

It does exist, you can see multiple people have ridden it via the presence of strava GPS traces:
https://www.trailforks.com/trails/byrning-man/

If forestry SA have explicitly closed it or removed access; there are better ways to model that. However, since they created the trail on trailforks and are actively engaged with local mountain biking clubs; that seems fairly unlikely they would close it off but also not update any other sources.

Hey @Softgrow - note/2663249 might be a good discussion to join if you've been in the area since the redevelopment, re south rd

way/105577808#map=19/38.46400/27.21749 seems a bit off - accidental reshaping of the building or intentional/different imagery?