There's better imagery available in the Digitalglobe Standard layer

I've tended to err for the webpage most directly describing a specific physical location; ie so you can find contact details or hours.

Any chance the rug place is "Hali Rugs" rather than Rugs Hall?

I think its http://winetasmania.com.au/east_coast_wine_route/listing/devils_corner_cellar_door_lookout

This unfortunately seems very offset from GPS traces (see improve-osm.org) and imagery (which aligns to the improve-osm.org gps traces. Is it worth moving everything in one go?

way/254751950 might not quite exist, isn't in http://maps.sa.gov.au/plb/ - have taken it out for now.

Nice work! If there's a particular area you'd like to flesh out a bit, more than happy to help (particularly roads with shops/other POI on them) - have done a bit around Glenside for example.

Adelaide railway station seems to be duplicated in this one.

Bit hard to decide if airbnbs are tourist accomodation or not.

Oh, let me see what's on my bike camera from today, rode around a bunch of Glenelg... will upload to mapillary

These are now removed

Removed these, there's no evidence of any of them from imagery.

Removed this, its not verifiable

Removed this, its not verifiable

I removed this.

I think some of these buildings are double mapped; its a bit hard to tell which is the more accurate changeset

Ah thanks for fixing that up, and welcome to OSM!

The current mapbox imagery seems to be blank, which is weird. Non free imagery suggests they do exist though.

Better to model the different chunks as building:part I reckon; and the building 'footprint' as a building.

A bit hard to get them all in a relation properly with ID; dunno about other editors

What's the source for these, bing doesn't appear to have the buildings.

Unfortunately a lot of these seem duplicated as well; and I can't pick which is the most accurate version

Its probably better to map the individual cafes/restaurants as points