Danke für die Korrektur. Ich hatte mich auf die Baustelleninfo auf www.hvv.de verlassen, bei der nichts von der Verkürzung der U4 zu lesen war. Nachdem ich das Bautagebuch hier gelesen habe, verstehe ich diesen U2/U4 Hybridbetrieb bis Horner Rennbahn und den U2 Shuttle bis Billstedt jetzt besser: https://schneller-durch-hamburg.de/u2-u4-sperrung-beendet gelesen

Thanks for fixing that. No idea how that slipped through as JOSM would normally flag these duplicate unconnected nodes on upload.

Hallo Max,
Der Building-Tag sollte wiedergeben, wie das Gebäude gebaut wurde, nicht wie es genutzt wird. Kann ich von aussen schwer einschätzen, inwieweit der Bau substantiell umgebaut werde. Wenn du mehr weisst, kann es Sinn machen building=apartments zu taggen.
Viele Grüsse,
Claudius

Thank you for fixing this. I found a bit of conflicting info on what's the westernmost station of the extension. Hopefully the full extension to Kaymakamlik will open later this month

This is an underground station location. The subway entrances are marked via a separate railway=subway_entrance object

changeset/147456175

Hallo,
Darf man denn in beide Richtungen auf der Hauptstrasse 30 km/h fahren? Man kann durchaus verschiedene Geschwindigkeiten in beiden Richtungen per maxspeed:forward und :backward eintragen. maxspeed wird dann einfach nicht eingetragen

I couldn't find service=long_distance documented anywhere. Can you help me find documentation of it? It seems to be a tagging only used for train routes otherwise.

Always happy to help improving OSM data.

Stand allerdings nicht da, als ich vor 5 Monaten dort vorbei lief.
Wenn für dich das wiederherstellen zu kompliziert ist, kann ich das gerne übernehmen. Soll ich?

Hi, yes there is only one Eritrean (and Ethiopian) orthodox church, the addition of "tewahedo" is not necessary and not established in OSM therefor. Just have a look at the currently used denomination values at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/denomination#values that contain "orthodox". Search box is on top right

Hi and thanks for your contributions to improve public transport stations in Barcelona.

I came across your changes on both Plaça de Sants and Plaça Espanya where you created some very large stop area relations for all of the public transport (PT) infrastructure on that location. If the PT infrastructure is a separate location (like metro stations, bus stations) it is preferable to create separate stop areas which are then linked via a stop_area_group relation that contains all of them. You can see an example here for Espanya which contains the metro, GCG and bus stop areas: relation/5720834

Could you follow this established tagging scheme, please? Here's the related documentation: osm.wiki/Relation:public_transport

Let me know if you have any questions.

Hi Zeev,

The main difference is that Carmelit is an (underground) train pulled by a cable which is the definition of a funicular :) Subways are never pulled by cables. English wikipedia also calls it a funicular: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carmelit
Also see the Hebrew article on funiculars which in particular mentions Carmelit: https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%A4%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%A8

Which aspect of a subway do you currently not represented by the data of Carmelit in OSM?

Includes some regional train routes, too

Hi and thanks for your detailed contributions in the Oslo region.
In this changeset you added platform ways on both directions of the Skullerud stop. The problem is that you added them while more detailed platform objects in form of areas already exist:
way/164165740
way/164165741
From a data perspective it looks like there are now 4 platforms at Skullerud. What was your motivation for adding these ways? Maybe together we can find a better way to improve the station data.

Thanks for clarifying and for the great work in adding more detail to public transport in Lisboa. Obrigado

Hi Diogo,
Why did you delete multiple metro station objects, e.g. Picoas and Saldanha?

Fine by me as long as it's not tagged like an active route as it was before my change.
Although I would argue that a route rarely gets constructed, only it's infrastructure does ;)

Hier auch noch die ursprüngliche deutsche Definition als "Gesamthalt-Gruppe": osm.wiki/DE:Proposed_features/Public_transport_schema#Gesamthalt-Gruppe

Hallo, stop_area_group ist mit über 5000 Verwendungen etabliert im mapping von ÖPNV-Stationen, um bei baulich und/oder betrieblich unterschiedlichen Stationen darzustellen, dass sie funktional im ÖPNV-Netzwerk eine Umsteigerelation darstellen. Siehe auch die Diskussion zu der Warnung im Wiki: osm.wiki/Talk:Relation:public_transport
Ich denke fast, dass die Warnung im Wiki irreführend ist und entfernt werden sollte.

Thanks for providing these additional documents. Seems like this information about exact layout of CWY and possibly RESA within (and the gold info about EMAS installment) is really only obtainable from AIPs and very hard from satellite imagery.
Which leaves two questions:
1. Are AIP (locally/globally) a valid source for adding information to OSM?
2. Can we agree on and document a scheme for mapping clearways, RESA and EMAS in OSM? In the past there was quite a mix between clearway, stopway, blast pads in OSM and some verifiable exact description is really necessary for these to work. Are you interested in working out a really comprehensive tagging scheme for all things around runway infrastructure?