Kommentar sollte heißen: Straßentyp aktualisiert und Straßen ergänzt

Kommentar sollte heißen: Straßentyp aktualisiert und Straßen ergänzt

Weiß ich leider nicht. Hab nur das Tagging vom Hauptweg nach Abschluss der Bauarbeiten wiederhergestellt.

7216692 seems to be an orphaned stop area of Miles End, since there are already two stop areas for Central line (203910) and Hammersmith & City (9861906). The platform objects are also already part of these and they are members of the interchange stop_area_group.
So I would say relation/7216692 isn't needed any longer

Dobrý den Vojta,
I would argue that Lines 1 and 2 of Guadalajara Metro are still light rails with some underground sections for the following reasons:
- They have sections that are overground and contain level crossings with car traffic. That alone usually is sufficient for the infrastructure to be not considered a subway in OSM
- The rolling stock TEG-90 and TEG-15 that is being used is not of a heavy metro but more of a heavy tram both in passenger capacity and speed
- Electrification is done via overhead wires instead of a third rail (not an exclusive argument against subway tagging, but subways are more likely to have third rail).
For more details on picking the right tagging see this section on the OSM wiki: railway=light_rail#Recommendations

I would ask you to re-consider the tagging as a light rail to be in line with how this tagging is used in OSM and not have another local deviation.
I am happy to help reverting the tagging. Let me know if you want to take up the offer.

Best,
Claudius

Heißt das nicht "Zum Nordpol"?

Leider hast du wohl aus Versehen den Stationsknoten mit gelöscht: node/5267852456/history - Ich stelle den dann wieder her.

Hallo Bobbi123,
Kannst du erklären, warum du den Bahnhof von Leutershausen-Wiedersbach gelöscht hast?

Thanks for clarifying. I've updated Line 10 route relations accordingly

Hi,
I cannot find any information about the opening of Chongqing Rail Transit Line 10 to Nanping (南坪).
Can you confirm this section is already operational?

Can you please explain why you deleted stop position of various public transport routes all over the place (including London Paddington)? Lines are still operating there

Thank you for the specific correction about the station construction instead of track.

Hi,
Busan metro line 4 infrastructure is called metro/subway but actually in OSM tagging a rubber-tyred monorail / automated people mover (APM). See monorail=* for the description on the rubber-tyred APM
What's your motiviation to tag it as light_rail?

Hallo Micha,
Warum verbindest du separate Haltebereiche - vornehmlich Bahn und U-Bahn-Stationen - in einem stop_area? Wenn, dann sollten diese intermodalen Umsteigeinfrastrukturen mittels übergeordneter stop_area_group-Relation verbunden werden.

Hi,
Can you explain your reasoning for removing the interchange station tagging via the stop_area_group relation connecting the two stop_areas for each line?

I see. Even the other metro lines have directional "-D" and "-G" suffixes. See the list in the line dropdown at:
https://www.ego.gov.tr/en/hareketsaatleri?hat_no=B1-D&kalkis=&varis=

Still confusing that this info is only found there and in the app, but not on the actual trains or signage on the stations. So following OSM's "on the ground" verifiability rule I would lean towards not putting those suffixes on the route relation.
Do you think it would be worth aligning all Ankara metro route reference tagging to that?

In addition to a wikipedia tag linking the Persian article to the city there were also obsolete wikipedia:en and wikipedia:fa tags present. I simply removed those in my change

Hi,
I cannot find these reference anywhere on stations, trains or the timetables at https://www.tcddtasimacilik.gov.tr/tren/baskentray-banliyo-treni/
Where did you get these directional route references from?

Hi,
Did you consciously deleted the station and stop position nodes for São Sebastião?
E.g. node/6417780992/history

Hi,
Can you share why you updated network tag for Overground lines to National Rail? The smallest network these lines are part of seems to be London Overground even though this is a part of the larger National Rail network. I think it makes more sense to tag the more local network for these routes. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Overground