Yes, correct. I'm not on the ground there to be able to validate the name information though.

Done in changeset/138618750

If that's the reality on the ground, it should probably updated. You might already be aware, but the primary language question is a heated topic in that region. Knowing a bit about Iran's shortcomings in recognizing local cultures I would expect all official signage (city limit signs, official buildings etc) to be in Persian, so probably it's still fair to maintain that as the primary on the ground language.

You are right that clearway is better suited as an area object.

Seems it's time to review a bunch of stopway objects in Russia then :P

Danke für die Korrektur und die Information zur Betriebsordnung.

Weisst du zufällig, ob das (Betrieb nach AEG) auch auf die Parkeisenbahn in Leipzig zutrifft?

Entschuldige bitte die verspätete Antwort. Das die Gleise nicht auf ORM angezeigt werden sollte kein Argument für ein Tagging sein. Das wäre "Tagging für den Renderer". Vielmehr sollte ORM sein Tagging auch auf Infrastruktur für Liliputbahnen erweitern :)

Ich hatte die Änderung in Dresden damals vorgenommen, da ich im wiki damals eine Angabe zur Spurweite für Liliputbahnen gelesen hatte, die auf die Parkbahn auch zutraf. Inzwischen finde ich das leider nicht mehr. Es scheint, als hätte sich die OSM-Praxis dahin verlagert, Liliputbahnen nur bis 260mm Spurweite zu taggen und darüber als Schmalspur.

Looking at this Video it seems indeed the lines are operated with left hand traffic: https://youtu.be/vWp-L49liOA?t=212
I'm updating the route relations accordingly now

Hi,
The tagging scheme using "wikipedia:<LANGUAGE_CODE>" is outdated and out of use and discouraged for quite a while in OSM. Article language variants can be obtained via wiki interlinking on the wikipedia page or the wikidata information. The wikipedia tag should link to the article in the most common on the ground language which seems to be Persian from what I could tell from tagging practice in the area.

Very good question and I'm confused that BKK is using different colours for their network map diagram and publishing via GTFS. Just checked the date stamp on the BKK diagram and that was last updated on 10th of July 2023 so I would consider that as the latest source of truth.

Might be worth reaching out to the BKK team to let them know of this data discrepancy.

Hi, thanks for revewing this change. I am seeing tower:type=communication in tagging practice being primarily used to tag towers that house communication antenna (mobile tower, directional communication antenna etc.). Unfortunately, the OSM wiki documentation is not very specific in defining this tag.
I don't think this tag applies to an airport control tower since the purpose of building this tower is to observe ground (and incoming/outgoing runway) traffic on the airport. I would say that tower:type=observation is more suitable therefor and I've already seen airport traffic control towers being tagged this way. Ideally though I think it would deserve a new tag like tower:type=atc or tower:type=control_tower since it's a distinct tower type constructed for this purpose.
What do you think?

Thanks for providing the airport chart for additional context as it's hard to tell stopways and clearways apart in many Russian airports since they often lack the distinctive runway markings.
I would still suggest to tag the clearway outlines as area:aeroway=clearway and add a linear aeroway=clearway along the runway axis.

Glad I could help.

Hallo Julian,
für die S8 von Dresden nach Kamenz existiert bereits eine Routenrelation: relation/5462996
Laut VVO-Fahrplan gibt es auch keinen S8-Routenführung nur von Radeberg nach Kamenz.
Du schreibst im Änderungssatz "nicht elektrifizierte Teilstrecke". Diese Information ist aber an der Schieneninfrastruktur enthalten und gehört nicht zur Route.
Alles in allem scheint deine Routenrelation ein Duplikat zu sein, ausser es gibt einen besonderen Grund, warum diese Route so bedient wird.

Hi Lamassu,
You added most of the Kerbala International Airport grounds as part of this changeset and quoted "Esri World Imagery" as source. While I can see the Western runway under construction in ESRI imagery, there is no trace of the Eastern runway and the central terminals. Are these already construction finished today? All information I could find online lead me to believe that this airport is still far from finished in June 2023. Do you have some more up to date sources?

Kommentar sollte heißen: Straßentyp aktualisiert und Straßen ergänzt

Kommentar sollte heißen: Straßentyp aktualisiert und Straßen ergänzt

Kommentar sollte heißen: Straßentyp aktualisiert und Straßen ergänzt

Weiß ich leider nicht. Hab nur das Tagging vom Hauptweg nach Abschluss der Bauarbeiten wiederhergestellt.

7216692 seems to be an orphaned stop area of Miles End, since there are already two stop areas for Central line (203910) and Hammersmith & City (9861906). The platform objects are also already part of these and they are members of the interchange stop_area_group.
So I would say relation/7216692 isn't needed any longer

Dobrý den Vojta,
I would argue that Lines 1 and 2 of Guadalajara Metro are still light rails with some underground sections for the following reasons:
- They have sections that are overground and contain level crossings with car traffic. That alone usually is sufficient for the infrastructure to be not considered a subway in OSM
- The rolling stock TEG-90 and TEG-15 that is being used is not of a heavy metro but more of a heavy tram both in passenger capacity and speed
- Electrification is done via overhead wires instead of a third rail (not an exclusive argument against subway tagging, but subways are more likely to have third rail).
For more details on picking the right tagging see this section on the OSM wiki: railway=light_rail#Recommendations

I would ask you to re-consider the tagging as a light rail to be in line with how this tagging is used in OSM and not have another local deviation.
I am happy to help reverting the tagging. Let me know if you want to take up the offer.

Best,
Claudius