CjMalone's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 112969735 | This also added a CeX in a residential area. Seems unlikely. |
|
| 121805274 | I've requested a review, not for the alignment, but for someone to check all the link roads, connections, etc. I don't usually map this stuff so I've no idea if it's right or wrong. Bing has just been updated to show the new layout. |
|
| 99230973 | Yeah, I don't think it should separated, but I don't know enough about lanes, cycle lanes or routing to delete it. |
|
| 118521964 | Doubt it. Removed in changeset/119553875 |
|
| 119495871 | Thanks bro but you're about 9 years to late. |
|
| 119381866 | That one does have a name and brand tag. I could do with spending some time on Morrisons Daily though, I think FHRS is unusually up to date on the McColl's -> Morrisons Daily fascia change. |
|
| 113342544 | Hey, just seen this. No, it doesn't look like you added it to the relation in this, but I'm considering deleting the relation, or removing the individual points from the relation. It's not the kind of data OSM usually stores. |
|
| 118324129 | I think it i's clearly vegetables, but if you want to change it to sells:vegetables, I wont argue against it. |
|
| 118324129 | I think sells:veg is OK tagging, it fits with sells:tobacco and other sells:*. They aren't that popular but it's useful data. |
|
| 118335522 | Nice one, fixed the name in #118907705 |
|
| 118129406 | I've should have cleaned up this changeset in #118775388 |
|
| 118128529 | Cleaned up in #118774953 |
|
| 109894105 | Did you get around to documenting the tags? I have no preference, feel free to update this one. |
|
| 118129406 |
Shouldn't have made it to OSM. record_type shouldn't be in OSM. |
|
| 117122175 | This is testing a new MapComplete theme. Don't worry, I'll clean up the data. |
|
| 116585195 | It's a duplicate of disused:shop. I'm trying to stop the build up of shops that shop=shoe & disused:shop=book like this: |
|
| 105741063 | By chance, the next one I looked at: Just looking at the current OSM data there is no way to identify which is correct, is it a disused shoe shop, or a in use book shop. Looking at the history we can obviously see it's a book shop, but data consumers can't. |
|
| 105741063 | Hey, I don't think you should be adding disused:shop=* and shop=vacant on the same node. Just disused:shop=* is enough. While both identity an empty store front, having both can lead to shop=* being updated with disused:shop=* not getting removed. |
|
| 108480987 | Oh yeah, thank you |
|
| 108480987 | Do you know if this is staying closed forever? I heard all the Metros were changing into Express or Superstores |