Cheers - if it's gone then probably best to go ahead and delete it. Historical objects are kept in the database, so we can get them back if we do need to and it's possible to find them.

Also let me know if you have any questions.

HI - thanks for the edit, If there is no longer water here then we should probably just delete the feature?

Just checked the edit - looks great to me. Bye Bye long dead google plus link :)

Cheers, thanks for hitting the review button. Looks spot on to me.

Just been googling around - found TRO that indicates theis has been one one way quite recently. So we're all good. Could you also check FORTH GARDENS and HILLVIEW in Oakley and see if the markings are visible on them.

Thanks, unfortunately I don't know what Earth Watch is. It feels dangerous adding details like this based on on aerial imagery that can't be verified by anyone else.

I've added a note for someone to check this on the ground.

Hi - I can't see any evidence in the imagery of road marking indicating one way, if anything I can see cars facing both directions which would indicate that there isn't a one way system here?

Meant to finish, given you live here - overrides that rule.

Let me know if you have any question about OSM

Hi Andy - thanks for fixing this. Normally we would use the on the ground rule based on names as signed rather than what's "officially documented" But given ytou l

Hi thanks for requesting a review, the edit looks good to me.

Hi thanks for your edit; and thank you for requesting a review. The edit looks great, but the additional way was missing the service type tag. I've gone ahead and added this.

Thanks Colin - it would be good to add the bike parking as well?

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Let me know of you have any questions.

Cheers
Chris

HI Liam - one thing to look out for is the offset on the imagery. It looks to be like the Digiglobe Premium Layer has quite a big offset compares to GPS Tracks layer and other layers such as the Bing layer and OS OpenData Streetview. I ended up with offsets of -42,18 when looking at this which means that many of these adjustements weren't needed.

JUut want to say thatnks for signing up and helping to improve OpenStreetMap, OSM works best when we have locals editing so this is great.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Well spotted is it worth reverting the main changeset?

Thanks for signing up and fixing this!

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Just wondering what the reason fro the removal of the grass area in this changeset is?

Hi, thanks for signing up and editing OpenStreetMap. One comment, is that if you know the area, then it would be good to map actual building as remove the chalet from the hamlet itself. Let me know if yhou have any questions.

Cheers
Chris

Hi, what's your source for this?