@masoudghorbany
Although you have already been guided about the correct principles in registering name tags, you still did not enter the name tags correctly in changesets 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 13399666412, 178672856, 178672902, 13410044356, 178668353, and 178672325. Stop this. Doing this in large numbers will mean sabotage on your part.

@masoudghorbany
You did not edit the name tag correctly in changesets 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 13399666412, 178672856, 178672902, 13410044356, 178668353, and 178672325. This is not in accordance with osm rules. Stop it. Doing this in large numbers will mean user sabotage.

@masoudghorbany
I have corrected the name tag in changesets 178668353 and 178698677. This is done according to osm rules. Stop doing this. Doing this in large numbers will mean user sabotage.

The name tag is not registered correctly.

@masoudghorbany
Naming must be in accordance with the rules and if a mistake is registered, it must be corrected. You have not followed the rules in registering the title.

The hostname was correct. Why did you change it? I'll fix it again. Don't mess it up.

Hello @masoudghorbany
Continue to modify the rest of the branches as below.
node/13410152577

Hello @Ali Bahoush
We have to register according to the sign. The sign here has not yet changed from a square to a crossroads.

You can also modify your working hours in a more detailed way and improve your recording.

As a gift, I will correct the current form of the phone number to the correct type.

Well done
You found the right way. You can even contribute more by studying the rules more.
Good luck

Hi @Elhamn1992
If you are sure that this doctor no longer has an office here, registering it as disused is not correct. Because this is always included in the lease of an office. You can delete it completely or register it as an active office without the doctor's name. Also, cite the source in the description so that other editors don't make a mistake.
Thank you for your efforts to improve the map.

Hi @masoudghorbany
You have made changes to the title tag in changesets 176470842, 178569111 and 178584414 that do not comply with OSM rules. Your changes have been corrected in changesets 178167729, 178576958 and 178616246, but you have broken it again. Please stop doing this and read the rules and register correctly.

Hi @masoudghorbany
We can't break the rules, don't put multiple tags in one tag. The edits you made to some of the tags for this business are not correct. The corrections were made in changesets 178167729 and 178576958. Don't continue this process, otherwise I will have to report you.

Hi @masoudghorbany

Already in change package 178167729, an incorrect entry in the name tag has been corrected. According to the rules we have in OSM, we cannot create multiple different tags in one tag. If you continue to do this, you will be reported.

Hi @FEFdiego
According to osm rules for registering businesses inside arcades and buildings, we are required to register the interior of the building as separate rooms and floors within it.

At three or four points on the street, you have cut off the point without the speed or specific tag being different on that section of the street; when connecting the street to the alleys, if there is no change in the street tags such as speed, street light, height, width, etc., there is no need to remove the street from the integrated state.

Hi @Elhamn1992
The change you made here is wrong. This street has been a two-way street for over a year. You can check when the last change was made to prevent this from happening, some users even put the last check date on the feature itself, which is tagged check_date=****-**-**

I checked the signs at this intersection and the nearby streets, but I didn't see the word "Bahonar" anywhere. By the way, this word is related to another neighborhood in Ardabil. Please add it to the map using mapillary if you have seen a sign with this name in this area.

As you can see, in three-way intersections, the connection point is triangular and can be selected as an X-degree link, depending on the case. I modified it. If there were 4 lanes here with separate return lanes, the previous drawing would be correct, but here there are 3 main roads and a two-way side road without a separate return lane.