ChehrehBargi's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 123252036 | سلام ضمن تشکر از تلاش شما
|
|
| 139252965 | 1- According to osm.wiki/Good_practice, your statement applies to tents, not buildings. And my registrations are for buildings, so they are not temporary. It may be considered as abandoned, but you should not delete it because every complication is fixed on the ground and must be recorded.
|
|
| 139252965 | LockOnGuy@
|
|
| 139252965 | Regarding the inscription: In the new stone that was used, the summary is stated and my explanation is a more complete description. If the problem is only that, you should have corrected the inscription instead of erasing every place that I record. |
|
| 139252965 | In general, my whole problem with you is in the osm rules. But you are eager to drag it into a religious and political fight. Even if a building is closed for a long time, it can still be registered in the map. I definitely know the difference between a tent and a building. And my records from Karbala to Najaf were fixed buildings. I have not registered the tents. |
|
| 139252965 | LockOnGuy@
|
|
| 139252965 | Regarding the electric poles, you were the only one who warned about them, not others. In addition, I recorded their numbers according to the signs that were installed on the poles. You have removed all the lightning rods. You could register the original number with the name tag and the numbers that I registered according to their table with the loc_name tag. But you didn't. Meanwhile, the buildings you call temporary are not tents. They were all buildings. According to Wiki rules, every building and complex can be registered on the map. So your work was illegal. |
|
| 139252965 | LockOnGuy
|
|
| 139252965 | LockOnGuy
|
|
| 139252965 | User LockOnGuy
|
|
| 139252965 | User LockOnGuy
|
|
| 139252965 | Hello
|
|
| 139252965 | In the case of this grave, as in similar cases, such registrations have been made in this cemetery and in other areas, and the rules of Wiki did not prohibit the registration of graves, so my registration was correct. Even in the original name, I have registered in Arabic language and Arabic letters. I have included the Persian language in a separate tag. |
|
| 139249148 | In the previous note, I have explained the reason for the change in grading of this street. If you are still not convinced. Take a closer look there. Also read the traffic grading rules. |
|
| 139253536 | What is your purpose of spamming? You send a duplicate note for all my notes. The name I have added here in other languages is correct and removing you is definitely vandalism. You cannot prevent me from registering a public place name in other languages because this permission is issued by osm. |
|
| 139253414 | I mentioned in the previous note, my editing is according to the general rules of osm. I have made it very clear that it is not political. You deliberately want to express it in a different way. Anyway, if someone sees impartially, he will understand. |
|
| 139253317 | Your work is against the rules and you should understand that, not me.
|
|
| 139253611 | Even when I give you a clear example of a specific case, you still insist on turning it upside down. If you read my text correctly, you will understand that there is no prohibition to register the name of the street in another language, but you are blocking it with your personal taste. This is against the rules and goals of osm. |
|
| 139253429 | You insist on making my edit political when it is not. The rules according to which I have edited are very clear and specific. |
|
| 139253317 | You deleted my registrations 1 year ago without being able to give me a convincing reason. My registration numbers in those years until now are 139253611 - 139253536 - 139253429 - 139253414 - 139253317 - 139252965 - 139249148 - 126535042 - 126534584 - 126490195 - 1 26490129 - 126489098 - 126488377 - 126487173 - 126486938 - 126486726 - 126486709 - 126404473 - 126403896
|