Railwayfan2005
Are you going to fix the station name, or does someone else need to do it for you?

In this and your previous 8 edits in London, you trashed all the office, amenity, religion, shop, brand and building:part tags on all the many buildings you touched, removing places of worship, offices and countless restaurants, shops etc. You also trashed the 3d modelling of various well modelled landmarks eg the monument to the great fire. Additionally, you added meaningless layer values to a number of buildings (presumably due to iD's bad proposal of this as any kind of 'fix' for perceived overlaps).
All the height values you added were dubious at best, typically twice that expected where building:levels info is present.
Accordingly all these 9 changesets are reverted, and changes of this nature cannot and will not be tolerated.

Vandalism and dragged node reverted.
El vandalismo y el nodo arrastrado revirtieron.

highway=service tag carelessly added to landuse way, tag removed.

area of woodland deleted. what is your intention here?

Area of woodland deleted on west side of southern lake. Was this intentional? Are you going to replace these deletions?

In this changeset you deleted a significant area of woodland and also dragged/merged a node marking the square part of the car park in to a triangle, please revisit and correct these matters, and use meaningful changeset comments so that your edit intentions are understood

In this changeset you deleted 4 areas of mapped woodland and dragged a surveyed footpath feature out of position. These elements of the changeset have been reverted. Please take care to respect existing mapping, and use meaningful changeset comments so that your edit intentions are understood.

In this changeset you dragged a node and merged it with the edge of trees ~200m away, I've reverted it for you. Please use meaningful changeset comments.

The key word there is 'dedicated'.
But where the road is a public right of way that remains open but has car/lorry access removed, marking access=no says the road is closed (except...) which works ok, but starts from the position that the road has been closed to the general public. OSM is a map for all users, not a car map.
Please identify any router that does not know about motor_vehicle.

The use of access=no, foot=yes, bicycle=yes, bus=yes results in a lot of tags and tends to encourage map rendering with the way appearing to be closed/unavailable. As an alternative motor_vehicle=no, bus=yes is available.

Hi Greg011 and Bernard,
I had a look at this last night and based on the changeset description and the imagery (all including the oldest plus the OS OpenData StreetView have the same), I think nothing has changed, just the total invisibility of the feature on all the map renders was confusing?
It was tagged ok to block cars/lorries, although the tag psv=yes had been set which (I think inappropriately here) allows taxis as well as buses. Also the road was set as tertiary ie main through route which isn't good with this feature in it.
So I've set the road section as residential, changed the gate bit to highway=service, lanes=1, bus=yes and added the bollards which should better reflect the actual position.
Cebderby (Clive)

Can you reverse the false connection at node/5613999532, it was very carefully set as connecting the bridge and elevated ways to the lifts and NOT the platforms.
Also the reason that plat 7 track was set as siding was that no passenger services ever stop there (unless something has changed)
regards Cebderby (Clive)

Hi TheMoneyTour,
Can you please add meaningful changeset comments, something as simple as "added details to golf course" would normally be fine for your edits.
However in this changeset you also deleted a designated public footpath way/23899877 which is Birmingham public right of way ref BY 4104 (and shortened the way/528449331 marking the old roman road line). This is presumably a mistake and the deleted way can/should be recovered (I can do this if you need).
Cebderby (Clive)

Why is it that EVERY SINGLE ONE of your edits needs to be reworked to fix the bad way shape, bad alignment and sometimes bad tagging?
Please use the best available imagery (typically the new sharp Bing imagery in many places), ALIGN IT to existing mapped features, LOOK AT the imagery to see the actual way shape and map more accurately. Kindly rework this edit and review ALL your edits for quality.

Deleted false way. Why set source=maxar and use Esri imagery, when Bing imagery is clearly more recent (this is a building site, marked as such).

Meaningless tag, adding no information, please remove

description has no place in address, please remove

what is your source for this boundary line?

village is not 'in' Doncaster, please remove