Reverted for misaligning building and adding fiction.

I ask again, what is the source of your information for details that cannot be seen on the Bing imagery?

No meaningful reply, fiction reverted. #DWG

@ivanbranco Agreed, clearly there is no human comprehension here. Have wasted too much time on this 'person', will prepare a bunch of notes and also report to DWG as soon as I can.

pboscherini,
Devi rispondere senza usare l'intelligenza artificiale alla domanda originale, confermare che ora capisci l'uso di "building" e "building:part", l'uso corretto di "layer" e che correggerai gli errori che hai commesso.
Devi dichiarare onestamente quali fonti utilizzi per le forme e le altezze di questo e di altri stadi sportivi che hai modificato.
Se non lo fai, il tuo account utente verrà segnalato, probabilmente verrà bloccato e le tue modifiche potrebbero essere annullate in blocco.
Capisci?

Perché stai aggiungendo queste curiosità irrilevanti quando hai almeno 50 ponti fluviali con falsi tunnel=culvert sotterranei sotto di loro che hai creato e che devi riparare. Così come molte piccole aree di "building" che devi correggere in "building:part".

Inoltre, qual è la fonte di questa modifica? È necessaria una risposta onesta a questa domanda.

La tua divisione errata della linea centrale del fiume Yarra e delle rotte dei traghetti a Melbourne è stata riparata. Tutto il falso tunnel=canale sotterraneo (fiume e traghetto) e lo strato=-1 (fiume) sotto i 5 ponti sono scomparsi.

È errato utilizzare amenity=parking per singoli posti auto all'interno di un amenity=parking esistente. Devono essere modificati in amenity=parking_space.
Inoltre, capacity:disabled non è un tag supportato.
Si prega di leggere amenity=parking_space

Si tratta chiaramente di una connessione telefonica/a banda larga. È sbagliato aggiungerlo come linea elettrica e pali. Si prega di rimuovere.

AI output will not be replied to. If you have something coherent you want to say, write it yourself. Italian is fine, we can translate it.
All'output dell'AI non verrà data risposta. Se hai qualcosa di coerente che vuoi dire, scrivilo tu stesso. L'italiano va bene, possiamo tradurlo.
Cebderby

2 wrongly removed islands undeleted, and lakes' names case fixed x5.
A reply from user webhound would be appreciated.

Wrongly removed island undeleted and re-added as lake multipolygon inner member. Names case fixed:
Note to user webhound: name= tag should only contain the proper (and verifiable) name of the feature, in title case ie capitalised initial letters, rest lower case, eg "Oxlease Lake". Not all upper case, not some words in lower case. You should also indicate your source somewhere for these names when you add them.

False (english) primary name and trashing of well mapped water areas, false 2nd outer water area covering land and buildings by new user reverted: changesets 147225388, 147227951, 147228069, 147228151
User webhound, if you know these water areas to be fishing=private, you are welcome to add this information, but do not trash the map in doing so.

All of the user's 8 changesets at Lac du Der-Chantecoq: 147258986, 147259044, 147259115, 147259218, 147259360, 147259432, 147259458, 147259539
are reverted as very damaging to the map. The correct lake name was already present on the multipolygon and did not need adding to the lake outer way, and all of the other changes were deletion of well mapped features which looks like vandalism but might possibly be new mapper inexperience. A reply from user webhound on these changes (and others) would be appreciated.

Changesets 147808414 and 147808706 reverted as badly damaging the map, with no indication of what, if anything, was the intent of the change.

Hi Bernard,
Thanks for the heads-up. Looks like there was an update to the area including realignment to Cadastral-aligned-Bing yesterday in https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147708927 which moved all except 8 nodes of the 3d shape. So I've selectively reverted that shift for this building then realigned the whole as intended. Thanks again,
Cebderby (Clive)

The same as commented a few days ago at changeset/146598861
this way was basically correct, having access=no except foot=yes, psv=yes. It was not a footpath, and it was wrong to set that all motor vehicles have legal access along here. Actually, with psv covering bus and taxi, it was a little too open; I have re-removed your wrong motor_vehicle=yes and changed psv=yes to bus=yes.
You can read up on all the complexities of access tagging at:
access=*

Hi WestWyreWanderer,
Welcome to OSM and thanks for your map updates. Please note the Esri imagery is a little newer than Bing (here, at the moment - it varies by location and over time) so it's worth checking both to compare to your valuable local knowledge. The Esri is often slightly less clear and more variable in alignment than Bing, but still useful. I've undeleted a pond which was added only a couple of weeks ago by another mapper.
Happy mapping,
Cebderby (Clive)

It looks like *way* 109208134 was part of that roundabout badly damaged by node drags, and that is the number of this changeset.
But also way/109208132 was the same, and your changeset/146597431 has reverted changeset/109208132 (just set/removed fee=no on some parking in Germany) so that should be reversed too, probably the only other affected?

Hi vw999 and welcome to OSM.
I've undone this change as the road already had oneway:psv=no (psv is bus and taxi) as well as oneway:bicycle=no to go with oneway=yes (for everyone else) and other tags relevant to this. Also you dragged a railway node - which is rather easy to do if you move the map in iD while editting (if the cursor is not the 'open hand' shape when you drag the map, it means something is under there and may be shifted). There were also 2 node drags in your other edit which are repaired (and the speed limit you added there is kept, thanks for that).