I would be willing to help with tagging them as private and/or tagging that the smoothness is very bad if we revert.

Ah okay, that makes sense. Thank you for letting me know, I'll definetly map in Hanoi like that next time :)

Good morning,

Thanks for your response, these turn roads/land access roads for farmers to access land are correct to be mapped as highway=track according to the osm wiki. highway=track

If there is an issue of vehicles getting stuck on the tracks due to faulty routing, it is probably a good practice to add access=private tags to the tracks that are on private property. Or a combination of surface=unpaved/surface=dirt and smoothness=very_bad that could be taken into account by the routing software.

Regards,
CasGroenigen

Hi, I'm only reading this changeset comment now, but I drew this by hand and this was not drawn by AI, and definitely not an import.

I tried my best to be as accurate as possible, but that's pretty hard with the available imagery, but I think I did a relatively good job?

If not, could you please point me to what I did wrong and how I could improve this when mapping in Hanoi next time?

Thanks, Cas!

Hi TehSmithster,

In your recent changes you have removed quite a lot of tracks from which a great chunck is still visible on Satellite imagery and have recently still been in use.

Could you explain why you have removed all these tracks? because I don't think they should've all been removed.

Here you can see your changes in this changeset overlaid with a satellite view: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153424877 A lot of the tracks are still visible here.

Would you agree with me reverting your changes?
I and some others would be willing to go over the tracks to correct some that might need to be re-aligned or removed anyways.

Kind Regards,
CasGroenigen

Oops, didn’t mean to create such a large changeset

I ment that I added a path instead of "added tags"

Not UK, but San Diego County

Not UK, but San Diego County

Hallo Herrieman,

Dit restaurant is zeer recentelijk gesloten bedenk ik me nu.
Ik weet niet zeker of ik de website daadwerkelijk heb gecheckt maar denk het wel.
Het kan zijn dat de website ergens in de afgelopen dagen offline is gehaald.

Bedankt voor het terugveranderen, kan gebeuren :)

Hallo allroads,

Ik zie dat je way/30179930 en way/276535377 van highway=residential naar highway=cycleway hebt veranderd, maar zover ik weet is dit nog steeds gewoon een weg voor auto's, en ik kom hier meerdere malen per week.

Zou ik mogen vragen wat je bron voor deze wijziging was?

Met vriendelijke Groet,

Cas van Groenigen

Hi Titlayomi,

I noticed a large part of the buildings you mapped here are not visible on any of the available aerial imageries.
Are you using any other sources to locate these buildings?

Also, many of the buildings are mapped are smaller than a square meter, it's hard to believe there are so many such small buildings.

Kind regards,

Cas

Thank you. Did I acidentally ask for review?

Thanks for the feedback, will be more careful in the future

Hi,
What point of interest are you talking about?
Cas

Congrats in the 150 millionth changeset! 🎉🎉

Thanks for the feedback!

Hallo Dillen,
Hier heb je dit hele vlak gemarkeerd als een gebouw, maar het winkelcentrum is niet één groot gebouw.
Is het goed als ik dit vlak verwijder en de tags name=Winkelcentrum Getsewoud
en operator:website=https://www.winkeleningetsewoud.nl/ verplaats naar het vlak van het handelsgebied?

Gr. Cas

BRP was geen source