I've cleaned them up, but Perkins, Burger King, Snappys, Apex Automotive, Flathead Transmission, and City Brew Coffee were all mapped twice: once with the information on the building outline, and once with it on a point inside the building.

Please don't use the "name" field to describe things, particularly in cases like this where the description is incorrect.

Is there a reason why you're creating duplicates of existing businesses rather than just adding the new information to the existing version?

I don't know. You'll have to ask Mesowhite, who was the one who originally made it a city: changeset/65947260

Is there a reason why you deleted the "place=city" tag from Beaumont, Alberta?

Not all imagery is created equal. In the case of the Numerica bank, the only imagery new enough to show it when I added it was "DigitalGlobe Standard", the only redeeming feature of which is that it's generally quite recent -- it's also very blurry and poorly-aligned.

Nowadays, we've got high-quality Bing imagery (I think it's about nine months old) and Esri imagery (three months older than Bing), and there's another aerial survey going on right now -- with luck, we'll have access to it in a few months.

The relationship between boundaries and rivers is an incredibly complicated area of law. In general, if the river shifts course gradually, the boundary follows the river; if it shifts course abruptly (eg. a flood causes it to settle into a new course), the boundary doesn't.

The geography of the Hells Canyon area pretty much ensures that any river movement will be gradual.

I've partially reverted this changeset. Many of the razed: or demolished: features you deleted are still visible in recent imagery, and having them mapped as demolished discourages armchair mappers from re-adding them.

I also restored one building you deleted that is visible in all available imagery.

I've fixed the road here.

The "Residential Road" tag is meant for roads running through residential areas, and for historic reasons, you'll also see it used as a generic "no particular road type" tag. Most of what you've added here should be using the "Driveway" tag.

You accidentally turned the entire Kalispel Golf Course into a sand trap here. I've changed it back, but please be more careful in the future.

Thanks for the addition.

When adding "floating" sidewalks like this, it's useful to connect the ends to the nearest street or driveway, even if there's no paved connection. This lets routing software know it's possible to move between the two.

When I drove along Fairview Avenue on the evening of May 11, 2017, it did not appear to be lit. Has that changed?

The problem is that this changeset added a number of bridges in places where there aren't bridges. Of the twelve I've checked so far, eleven haven't actually been bridges.

Could you please do this in smaller chunks? It makes it easier to review and fix mistakes (and there are quite a few here, such as every bridge I've checked so far).

You appear to have used the highway traffic signals preset for a railway signal at node/7290148178

Did you use the wrong signal preset here?

I've removed the highway designation and reverted the roads back to "highway=secondary".

I've removed the highway designation.

I've removed the highway designation.