Looks good! Thank you for making the map better! :D
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175203516

Hello and thank you for contributing to the map!

I've marked the changeset as bad as I don't think you've mapped the Perrotin London correctly but the information added is still very useful to the map.

Would you be able to clarify where the Perrotin London Gallery is? I'm guessing it's underground, underneath the sidewalk, with access from the street/hotel? It might be worth mapping as a single node rather than as a geometry as it can get pretty complex to map in situations like that. Equally feel free to reply on here if you'd like help improving how this is currently mapped.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175205782

Just reviewed your changeset and it looks good! Thank you for contributing to the map!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175215320

Noticed your account has just started editing the map. Thank you for making the map better and welcome to OSM!

If you end up adding more addresses and alike, for what I assume is your local area, I recommend using Street Complete (https://streetcomplete.app/) for surveying if you have an android phone as it's much faster than the iD editor for surveying purposes.

Hello!
Just reviewing this changeset and it looks really good! Thank you for making the map better! Just wanted to note that you deleted a building (way/1333464887) and it's associated tags and replaced it with another building (way/1442942272) with seemingly less information. I unfortunately cannot speak cymraeg so have no idea if the information was relevant. If you'd be able to double check that it'd be ace! In future it's also a good idea to delete the tags on a building and leave the object there so others can go back and check the history of the object.
Best of luck mapping!
- Canopy Falls
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173432896

That would be my guess. These cycle routes like NCN67 seem a little pointless. They often just kick cyclists out into roads with little to no notice and I don't know if it's worth actually keeping them mapped. This one here doesn't even have a lowered kerb for cyclists if memory serves me correctly. You're expected to just kinda wing it to get onto Stone Lane.
Thank you for repairing the relationship!

Hello Andy!
Thank you for catching this! I think I got distracted midway through adding pavement here. I've connected this up and added a marked crossing further down the road:
changeset/172985323

I want to survey this area more on foot and upload imagery to Mappillary before changing too much else due to the tree cover so I've left the footpath connections across the road even though they're incorrect. Lemme know if there's anything else that needs adding or changing!