Sorry, that should have been: “and the repeat_on= tag will specify that the *area* spans two floors.”

The duplicated H&M shop at Promenada mall will strike many map consumers as an error; there is only a single H&M shop here that spans two floors. Might you consider fixing this by e.g. specifying level=0;1 for the shop, and mapping it separately from the indoor=room?

I have already fixed the nearby Intersport shop in changeset/157730892. There, because the two floors have identical room dimensions, both the room and the shop only need to be tagged once and the repeat_on= tag will specify that the way spans two floors.

What is the source of these highway=motorway_junction tags all over Kyrgyzstan? I have not been able to verify any of these tags during on-the-ground surveys, and it is not common practice in the region to add them to trunk roads and primary highways.

Please do not add wild camping spots to OSM. The tourism=camp_site tag on OSM is only for campsites that are somehow official.

Why did you add denomination=sunni to sites in the Pamir region of Tajikistan? The people here follow the Nizari Ismaili denomination of Islam (i.e. denomination=shia).

You can do an Overpass API query for name:en tags in areas you have mapped.

English uses title case for street names, so "Abdi bobo street" should have been instead "Abdi Bobo Street". Please fix this error in all of the name:en tags you have created for streets in Uzbekistan.

direction=both is redundant on a stop sign node when the node is at the intersection and stop=all is already present. The only place I have seen direction=both also added is the LA metropolitan area.

Please do not add to houses the names of the families resident therein.

You added a trail at coordinates 37.4323147, 73.1036590 with the name= tag "Steep Trail". In Tajikistan, name= tags should be in Tajik, not in English. Does this trail have an official name? If no, the name= tag should be deleted. If you want to express the steepness of the trail, then difficulty or incline tags are a more appropriate way to do that.

If you do not explain your edits and match the facts on the ground, I will continue to revert your Samarkand changesets and escalate this matter to the Data Working Group. I see that you were already blocked in the past for writing only “исправление ошибок” as your changeset comment.

Please stop changing name= tags that I created on the basis of an on-the-ground survey, as when you changed the Uzbek-language name= tags of Samarkand's central parks back to English-language names. Name= tags for such public infastructure countries are in the local language, with English names specified in name:en= tags. Your changeset comments "исправление ошибок" are dishonest.

If you do not cease this destructive editing, I will have to escalate this situation to the Data Working Group.

This is a standard found across the world, and there is no need for Uzbekistan to be different.

You restored spurious name tags to the park along Universitet bulvari in Samarkand:

relation/4596554/history

I have deleted them again in changeset/153687537. For one, name= tags in Uzbekistan should be the Uzbek-language name, not English ones. Secondly, while I did a personal survey of this area, I was unable to verify that the park itself (as opposed to the surrounding road) has any such name.

Did you make a mistake? There is no text from you here, only my quoted changeset comment.

I have remapped this portion of Registon ko'chasi correctly in changeset/153333465.

I have remapped this portion of Registon ko'chasi correctly in changeset/153333465. Note that if you want to make further changes to the intersection of Kulolon ko'chasi and Registon ko'chasi, the primary_link roads (which I added a few days ago) are new and do not yet appear on Bing or Esri imagery.

One week ago, in changeset/152999693, I remapped Registon ko’chasi in Samarqand completely between Universitet bulvari and Islom Karimov bo'gi: originally this road was incorrectly mapped as a dual carriageway, but there is in fact no physical separation between the directions. It is a single way with lanes=4, lanes:forward=2, lanes:backward=2. This can easily be verified by a personal survey of the street.

It looks like my correct tagging has now been undone. Please tell me whether you did this in this changeset, or if the fault lies in subsequent changesets by use ChromeLotus.

Your edits to Registon ko’chasi in Samarkand are incorrect. That is, in changeset/152999693 one week ago, I remapped Registon ko’chasi completely between Universitet bulvari and Islom Karimov bog’i: in an earlier version, this road was incorrectly mapped as a dual carriageway, but it is in fact a single carriageway with lanes=4, lanes:forward=2, lanes:backward=2. This is easily verifiable by doing a personal survey of the road.

Somehow this correct mapping was undone, either in changeset/153159867 by user FUZZY_42, or in your recent changesets. Please let me know if you were responsible for this error, otherwise I will revert all the way back to FUZZY_42’s changeset.

Please do not remove footway=sidewalk tags from highway=paths in Poland representing combined or segregated footways/cycleways, as you did with way/864232970. The footway=sidewalk tag is widely used in Poland on such ways that are indeed sidewalks. The Osmose bug layer may complain about this, but this is a false positive in Osmose, not an error.