https://docs.tep.com/wp-content/uploads/North-Alvernon-SELUP-October-2024.pdf also used as a source

I think you were simply mistaken in this one case. node/13011166798. Bridges typically have headwalls or are paved. This is an unpaved road which has neither.

I think I may agree with you in that my initial assessment was wrong and that the road seems to be at a higher elevation than the wash so there is probably a culvert which you may be able to see on Esri World Imagery.

I just do not like iD because of this because it allows users to pick between a bridge and culvert where it places endpoints arbitrarily. You can essentially just click the button and it "fixes" it, leaving accuracy behind.

Nice job identifying the substation.

Also NAIP

Hey pittrichimica,
Please do not add false bridges such as way/1392368068. I would appreciate a comment acknowledging that you saw this.
Thanks,
BubbaJuice

And USGS 3DEP!

DOI link:
https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20173035

Thanks for contributing!

Apologies for the large changeset

Note as well that the forest service doc has trails that are being declared as no-longer maintained, but because I'm unaware of the validity of this in 2025, I am leaving them marked as operated by the Forest Service.

as well as https://arizona-content.usedirect.com/storage/Catalina-Trail-Map-2025.pdf

See more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O%CA%BCodham_language

https://azdot.gov/news/adot-reopens-improved-i-10-orange-grove-interchange (and survey)
https://docs.tep.com/wp-content/uploads/TEP-Ten-Year-Plan-Transmission-Projects-2023-2032-Maps.pdf

Go ahead and remove it, I must have accidently pressed the balloon or shrink-wrap key.
Thank you.

Also bing streetview

Hello,
I understand by having "SRP" in the name of these substations may make it easier to identify the operator, however, that is not their name. Please refrain from doing this.
Thank you,
BubbaJuice

Hello Cooper,

Are these railroads real?

Thanks,
BubbaJuice

Also here are some examples of good and bad:
Good (remaining grade): way/1192768798
Bad (no trace): way/1303525751#map=18/44.76574/-85.62568

Hi cmxn,

The general consensus in the community is that only railways with remaining remnants on the ground (such as a remaining grade as the bar minimum) should be mapped. Otherwise, these "abandoned" railways should not be mapped. However, this kind of work is perfect for OpenHistoricalMap at openhistoricalmap.org. There's some discussion on it here, if you're interested: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposing-to-deprecate-railway-razed-and-railway-dismantled/109679/64

I will probably delete the railways that you have mapped in a week or so or whenever you have had time to move them over to OHM.

Thanks, BubbaJuice

Hello,

Please do not remove detail from the map. I will be reverting this changeset.