Retagged "surfacemat" to "surface"

Could you contact me about this import?

Please check you have a tag named "#", and a county name that's not needed.

That's helpful. There's a second dumpster in the same area. Is this a rolling dumpster?

It appears to be a private dumpster, inside a locked gate. I imagine nobody would be welcome to place objects in it. Is that useful to have mapped?

Dear gepeix,

What does "natural_monument" mean for trees like node/2402344202/history . Those appear to be common backyard, road and farm trees.

Could you look at the tagging?

See also http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.openstreetmap/71741

This is a complete removal of denotation=cluster, please see here http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.openstreetmap.tagging/22925

There's been much discussion of the cluster value over the last four years, see the mailing list archives.

This was a lot of work, to hand curate and carefully unwind the damage done by the initial import and subsequent tagging.

The tags here are really... odd. Can we talk about improvements?

way/272142911/history

I saw you mapped a private dumpster within a private locked gate. It seems like that's an object we should not map. Your thoughts? Check the tagging list for discussion.

Is node/774726428/history a shop or a tree?

splling is spelled "spelling".

For example this way still has bad keys way/327597028 and is not deleted.

The bad data is not deleted, please check. Please revert this changeset.

Could you check these nodes for tagging issues. Keys like "Ponding Possibility" do not appear in other places.

I'm writing about the object ID's stored in: it:lombardia:ctrn:Limite_amministrativo_09:OBJECTID1-3 . Could you comment? Is this data OdBL compatible? Why include the object ID, especially with such long tag names?

This import spelled "height" as "hight".

The use of ";" in a key name creates problems. I see that came from whitewater=put_in;egress . Could you discuss on the tagging list?

The entire changest should be reverted!