Gledam Kursumliju, rekoh ko je dodao ove ulice sa osisanom latinicom i vidim tebe u ovom changesetu, rekao bih sa "pocetka karijere":) Razmisli da ih popravis, sa ovim iskustvom:) Ili ako hoces, nije ni meni problem, ali ne bih da ti diram u tvoju tvorevinu bez pitanja:)

Please reply here before we go in process of reverting. It might take us days to fix everything. You might be able to help us with your tooling.

plus you vandalized "name:en" in bus names, like node/1331577993. This is very unfortunate

Hi, I will revert this change. We adhere to PT v2 schema and we don't use "stop" role members, only "platform". I understand that you are just trying to be helpful, but this will require changing our automation (which we use to let us know about new GTFS releases or regressions like this) to "know" about stop positions too, and if you are really, really into adding stop positions, you should probably start topic at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs/64

Ops, I see now you are not native speaker, let me rephrase: great you added this line, look at PTNA for more details: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/gtfs/RS/trips.php?feed=RS-00-BGPREVOZ&release_date=&route_id=10029. What I noticed could be better is: "gtfs:agency_id", "colour" nije dobar, "gtfs:trip_id:sample" and "gtfs:shape_id".

Regarding bus stations, looks like they differ compared to bgprevoz.rs/PTNA. Do you have better insight, or we should go with official GTFS data?

Also, let me know if you would like to change it, or I can, I am OK with both:)

Super sto si dodao ovu liniju. Pogledaj u PTNA kako izgleda linija za detalje: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/gtfs/RS/trips.php?feed=RS-00-BGPREVOZ&release_date=&route_id=10029. Ono sto sam ja primetio je da jos moze da se doda je: "gtfs:agency_id", "colour" nije dobar, "gtfs:trip_id:sample" i "gtfs:shape_id".

Sto se tice stanica, kao da se razlikuju u odnosu na zvanicne (bgprevoz.rs) tj. PTNA podatke i ovo sto je dodato. Jel znas detaljnije nesto o tome (mozda da koristimo GTFS zvanicne podatke ako za ovo nisi siguran)?

Javi da li bi ti ovo da promenis ili hoces ja, meni je svejedno:)

My error. I was thinking about 406L in other direction (Vozdovac=>Beli Potok) and station 1615 was missing and it should be there as per GTFS (and not, as I said, that it was there and it should not be). I just added it in changeset/128408545. Please double-check it, as this station is really far away from where this route is passing by. Maybe it should be moved or 406L is not stopping there?

thanks for fixing! BTW, I think 406L didn't have this stop ("Kruzni put"). If you want, I can revert it? This route should not have it: relation/9803151

no problem, let me know if you need help with it (but I see you are using JOSM, so I guess you don't need it:D)

I understand you deleted bus station "Kruzni put". In GTFS, it is still there, for example: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/gtfs/RS/single-trip.php?feed=RS-00-BGPREVOZ&release_date=&trip_id=665800.

So, you are absolutely sure these 40x buses are NOT stopping there?

You are very often gluing roads to administrative boundaries. Please be more careful when doing that. Additionally, I am asking you to disclose for which company you are working and to join our channels (forum, Telegram) and introduce yourself. Problem is that 1) you are working for someone and you are not transparent about it, 2) your changes are with very bad descriptions, 3) source for street names are of unknown, potentially illegal sources, 4) you are not replying to mine nor other people comments.

Please announce yourself
---
Molim te pazi kada ucrtavas puteve, desi se da ih spajas sa administrativnim granicama. Takodje bih te zamolio da objasnis na profilu ili ovde za koju kompaniju radis i da se pridruzis kanalima na kojima se okupljamo da se predstavis. Problem je sto 1) radis za nekoga, a nisi transparentna, 2) izmene su ti sa jako losim opisima, 3) izvori podataka imena ulica su veeeeoma diskutabilni, 4) ne javljas se na moje niti na druge komentare.

Molim te predstavi se

Default je "yes". Nije ulaz u stambenu zgradu ogranicen, tj. svako moze da udje. Evo i na wikiju: entrance=*

Inace, ne vidim ga cesto u kombinaciji: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/entrance#combinations, ne znam ni da li ga stavljas

U Beogradu najvise ima "private", ali mislim da je to sve greska: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1mOe

Jel si siguran da treba private za entrance?

Da, nije isto kao [1]. Ali da li želimo da unosimo statističke granice? Do kog levela, gde je kraj?:) To mi je pitanje. EVo admin leveli nismo nikad uradili MZ (level=10), ne znam da li planiraš da ideš na dublje nivoe statističkih granica?

Evo sad kad je prenocilo - mislim da nema sanse da "preprave" njihove warninge zbog ovoga. Necu ni da se cimam. Ako ti smeta - samo reci i dodajemo metar da postane B!

Daj mi mesec dana, da pitam ove iz Geofabrika. Na opisu problema im kaze "Two rings touch each other at this node. This is not necessarily invalid but often indicates suboptimal mapping.". Iskreno, voleo bih da zadrzimo topologiju osmice jer je u RGZ-u osmica. Ako ne moze, dodacemo 1m granice da zadovoljimo geofabrik:/

Zdravo,
Vratio sam na 8-shape. Sad sam ga razdelio u relaciji kao dve odvojena outer poligona. Valjda se sad osminspector nece zaliti. Voleo bih da probamo da ga ostavimo kao osmicu jer je tako i u RGZ-u zvanicno. Ovo je changeset: changeset/126826893. Izvini sto ti ispravljam posao:) Ako se i dalje zali, videcemo - po meni treba da ostane kao osmica, a problem je u osminspectoru, ali ako svakih mesec dana neko uleti i zeli da popravi ovo, mora da se prilagodimo geofabrik sili:)

ovo je isto kao i relation/1658166? Ovo je dosta velika izmena, mozda bi trebalo da pokrenemo diskusiju da li zelimo da otvaramo ovu pandurinu kutiju zvani statisticki podaci. Jel mozes da zapocnes temu na forumu, tj. discoursu sada ili na mailing listi?

Mada vidim da su ovo zapravo sve sporedne ulice, kao da samo dodajes ime sa glavne ulice na njih, tako mi deluje:)

Zdravo, odakle ti svi ovi podaci o imenima ulica? Mozes li da ukazes na izvor? Hvala unapred