Hi, the station is preserved but per wiki the railway:preserved tag is supposed to be used exclusively for railway lines (tracks) themselves to indicate whether they are run as a heritage line. As for nodes and other infrastructure I'm not sure what most appropriate tag should be.

Reverted, it is currently being demolished

changeset/161321126

Reverted, it is currently being demolished

changeset/161321126

Hi, I removed the tree tag from relation, because it's not supposed to be uses on relation and nodes that belong to the relation already have their own tree tags

Portorož i Lucija nisu službeno gradovi (mesta) (https://www.gov.si/assets/ministrstva/MNVP/Dokumenti/Urbani-razvoj/naselja_s_statusom_mesta.pdf), a nisu očito ni sela pošto su urbanija naselja. Suburb je odgovaralo za prijelazni tip naselja. Meni nije imalo smisla svako polu-urbano naselje označavati kao da je zaseban grad

I believed that tram_level_crossing was appropriate tag since I saw it is used in cities lile Budapest, Vienna, Prague etc. and ID was recommending it as a default tag. There has apparently been some controversy about the use of the tag which I wasn't aware of and for that I apologize. I alway though of it as a normal widely used tag but if OSM community says otherwise I don't mind it.

These changes are all manual and done by myself. I changed the crossing tags to reflect that they are let crossing tram instead of rails and fixed railway=stop to railway=tram_stop tags.

The vehicle tag I completely forgot about because ID automatically has motor vehicle section and I was lazy to type it manually :l

(Also parking situation is really weird depending on the city. I think the easiest is to tag it as payed parking and add the operator if it's a city for example. Parking in Zagreb for example is pretty well tagged.)

As I've said before, if the changes are not recent I don't remember them. When I've been to Zadar I noted random signs and approximated their meaning and further expanded if there is Mapillary imagery. Also I've never said I've used dgu for street imagery or signs, that is for street names. If there are mistakes feel free to correct them.

Correct, I was replacing old parking:lane tags but forgot to add the new ones here.

I don't remember at the time, but most results say that it is "od Cezana" including this document from the city (https://www.grad-zadar.hr/repos/doc/POPIS%20ULICA.pdf). If signs are different maybe the name changed but the signs weren't changed?

Probably a typo because I remember seeing single t somewhere but the priority is given to signs mostly so the correct form is double t if it says so

I probably didn't know what highway tag to use since it's a big surface that is drivable by vehicles. Maybe area:highway=service shoud be used.

Hi,

the fare zone tag was probably accidental, but subway tag as far as I know is used for underground stations. Liverpool Street has an underground station but the node represents the main train station and if the subway tag is applied the station will be rendered as subway only

Bok,
ceste su potpuno pogrešno ucrtane i bile su u redu prije.
Linija ceste se crta ako su trake fizički odvojene bankinama, travom itd., a ne ako su obojane linije. U ovom slučaju se crta jedna linija i upisuju se broj traka i skretanja, a ne crtaju se zasebne linije za skretanja.
Pozdrav

Relation fix

changeset/150039602

Vandalism, reverted

Hvala na primjedbi, očito mi je pobjeglo kad sam unosio wikidata oznaku i kliknuo sam na grad a ne kolodvor. Sad sam popravio.

Pozdrav

slažem se, stavimo onda npr. tri područja za Vrbane 1, 2 i 3 da obuhvaćaju sve stambene projekte

bok,
vidio sam duplicirane nazive pa mi nije imalo smisla pošto je bolje imati jednu konkretnu oznaku. Sad vidim da je ipak tak bolje nego da se stavi ogromni landuse=residential koji prekriva cijelo područje. možda je dobro staviti granicu npr place=neighborhood