Hi, I just want to point out that what you've done here is actually duplicating several highways. This seriously disrupts routing. You've placed raceway highways on top of existing highways.

The Formula E raceway is already mapped in the route Relation: Formula E (9716334). Here it is:- relation/9716334 So there is no need to map it again. If amendments are needed the relation is what should be amended/edited, not just draw duplications over existing mapping.

Could you please correct your mapping at least to remove the duplicate highways?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I just wanted to let you know that Upper Level (Demolished) is not a name, I've changed it to a note tag.

Also if a building is demolished, (not now in existence), then it should be removed from OSM.

Regards Bernard

Hi, You somehow added duplicated highways Way: Hollowood Lane (1086145000) and Way: Hollowood Lane (1086144774) by drawing them on top of existing highways.

I've removed the duplicate keeping your new surface tags.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, It was flagged as a self-intersection so I knew which outline was causing the problem. Even so, it was challenging to detect where the self-intersection was. Eventually, I pulled the suspect out and found a duplicated node. Glad to help. How do you view these building shapes?

Regards Bernard.

No response so I've removed the name from the highway.

Hi, Just to let you know you inadvertently duplicated Hartington Street by adding Way: Hartington Street (1085735761) atop of the existing road.

I've removed the duplicate.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I'm sure there are barriers here so they ought not to be removed simply because you cannot route through them. I can't see that you uploaded data to say open to all vehicles, even if you did it would take several days to be used by routers. Could you say what software refused to route across the railway?

I've added back the barriers tagging them to allow vehicles and non-motorized traffic. Please wait at least a few days for the data to take effect.

By the way, the crossing at Station Road, Lakenheath to the west of here has the barriers tagged as just lift_gate and routing is as expected allowing all traffic through.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Way: 924389691 is a service road serving some garages.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You dragged the joined building out of alignment and overlapped them. I wonder if you realise that the Bing imagery you used might not be precisely placed, often it's way off. The Maxar imagery showed the building precisely positioned. So before moving things you need to check that they need moving and that where they are moved to is better. Also check that the move doesn't conflict with other objects.

Thus I've reversed the change.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Thanks for responding and your good explanation of the layout. I've amended the building to three sections tagging the path as tunnel=building_passage. It was easier for me to do it than explain what to do, hope you don't mind. The routing takes time to come into effect, I'll check that it's OK later.

With the building as three sections would it be correct to say one is toilets, one is ticket/membership, and the other obviously a passageway? If so the two POI descriptions should be placed on the appropriate building tagging.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Surely there would be foot access through or by these gates to get to the public paths. Maybe agricultural access as well. The tag access=no on it's own means there is no access through at all.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I would question whether the path does actually go through the building or if are there two paths going to two entrances to the building. If it goes through then it should be mapped appropriately, is it an internal corridor straight through, a passageway, or open space under a roof?

At the moment the path passes over the building and routing is not determined as going through the building. It's just wrong.

Need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A named node/point is really meaningless to the OSM database or any map rendering. It is not therefore a verifiable feature. Personal data, POIs should be saved offline, not uploaded to a live worldwide database. Sorry, but IMHO the name ought be removed as per OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Capitalised name.

Capitalised name.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Wellington Pier is already mapped so your commercial area is a data duplication. Also, OSM practice is that formal names are capitalised. should be.

I've removed the area, capitalised the name, and squared the buildings up.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've tweaked the house outlines and addresses. You'd somehow drawn a house atop of another.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've reverted your changes, this line is outlining a residential area, it's not a highway.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, It's handy for folk to know if benches have backrests, via the tag backrest=yes/no.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, OK thanks for that. I've now removed all the lines from OSM. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.