Hi, I've amended several building part outlines that had self intersections. I made them into two part multipolygons. This now properly shows the areas without self intersection of any lines. This method avoids self intersection which is an incorrect method.

Regards Bernard

Hi, I amended the opening hours to suit OSM practice and added the website.

Hi the road is accessed from a private service road so cannot be more than a private service road. I've amended the status.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've removed your width=0 as, if this were true the track width would not be visible.

Regards Bernard

Hi the car parking data is already on the feature outline, there is no need for it to be duplicated on a POI. The car park POI can be removed.

Regards Bernard.

The data of this node is already on the building outline so I've removed the duplication.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, there are self intersections to Way: 683885522

Hi, in this changeset there are a lot of anomalies, roof shapes being a straight line doubling back, these are tagged as roof:shape=flat, none of the main roofs are flat.
Also please be informed that there are basement levels to this block.

Please see :- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-0.15957&lat=51.52354&zoom=18&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way for the ways and intersections.

Regards Bernard

Hello MacLondon,

Sorry to say that Way: Wood Lane (687179793) has been made to double back on itself (from A to B and back to A).

There are a lot of routes involved so I'll leave it for you to repair.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

This Travelodge is already mapped so I've removed your duplicate POI.

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your deletion and redrawing resulted in an inaccurate depiction of the area. It is always far better to enhance an area with a better truth than to depict untruth to further your individual needs. The rule is verifiability and never map/tag for the renderer.

So I've reverted these changes and added to the original mapping. I marked the car park as access=customers so folk will know it's not public. I redrew the church, added address and website details. Drew the church hall. Drew the overall grounds tagging them landuse=religious.

I think this would cover what you were trying to do but please enhance further if you wish. Just ask if you need help.

Regards Bernard

These terrace blocks are drawn incorrectly, they do not properly reflect the building footprint. Way: 685612268 does not show that each house has a recess to the rear.

Further when drawn in this manner it is difficult to later terrace the block into individual houses so that addresses can be easily added.

Please do not refer me to your wiki page for discussion, this comment should be responded to, thanks.

Regards Bernard.

PS I added the website.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I can see you have tagged the whole building as the restaurant. Although you comment on this changeset that the two POI are closed/deleted those two POI are still on the map. They have not been deleted.

If you need any help just ask. Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Pretty good mapping for your first go but just a few problems as outlined and explained below.

I joined your three gates to the highways, unconnected they left the highways with no barrier. Gates connected to highways show a barrier on that highway.

I amended access-no to access=private on footway (Way: 29060299), if its a footway then there is some form of access to it. Access=no means there is no access to the feature.

Regarding area Way: 686648916, is it a private car park? You've tagged it motor_vehicle=private but only shown a footpath into the area, how do vehicles get there?

No response so I've fixed it.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've squared up the buildings you added and tweaked them a bit. There is a facility to square up buildings in the iD editor.

Regards Bernard.

I've reinstated the removed designations.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've made quite a few corrections to your mapping including reinstating some designation of access. Please take time to ascertain OSM practices and please don't change other folks mapping unless you are sure you are correct.

Designations on public paths are to show legal rights.

Please do not remove experienced mappers notes, they are usually there for a positive reason, to help you.

Regards Bernard

Hi I removed this way. If there is a formal parking aisle here this is not the way to depict it, overlapping, doubling back and not connected to the greater highway network.

Regards Bernard.