OK I've corrected a lot of them for you. But you really ought go back and correct all the errors, the buildings should then be squared up.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I squared up your newly mapped buildings, I hope you will agree they look better now.
You can square up buildings in the iD editor, select the building, right click, select the square icon, bingo.

Regards Bernard

Hi, I've squared up and amended the outlines of the buildings, also amended the addresses and postcodes. This to suit OSM best practice.

Regards Bernard

Hi, you've tagged this site as a named area with no tags stating what the facility is actually used for.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The two areas you've added look like they are drawn over the old imagery, they are not tagged as buildings though. Are you sure those two buildings, (if they are buildings) exist today.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've moved a lot of the field boundaries and hedges off of highway center lines. Fields and hedges don't extend to the middle of the road.

I've also moved the footpath off the hedge and field boundary, path line is now clearly shown as north of the hedge on the field edge. I see you tagged it foot=designated. If the path is a Right of Way you could tag it also with designation=public_footpath, this will show folk they have a legal right to walk there.

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The area you've added as St Botophers park is actually private gardens. I've tagged to area to reflect this.

I can find no reference to a St Botophers park nor Saint Botolph's Park. The church of Saint Botolph's is to the south west, perhaps the rectory grounds were once referred to as a park or parkland. But they also are gardens or farmland.

Regards Bernard

Hi, surely the actual memorial is the structure in the middle of this plot.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Unfortunately the 6 nodes you've added contain no information at all. One in a field another in a park, the database can gain no information as such so they ought all be removed.
If you could say what you were trying to achieve maybe I can help. Any question please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi Tony,
No problem, I've reverted it for you, just as well I did it as there were two conflicts of data.
I think I know the PDF's you mention, for copyright reasons it's not allowed to use them ,without express permission, to add data to OSM. Please see bottom of this page :- osm.org/copyright
I agree there are many ways missing here, it's mainly due to the poor aerial imagery coverage. This will improve in time and for precise positioning of ways it might be better to wait a while. However if you can get good gpx tracks when you ride these ways, they can be uploaded to OSM for you (and anyone else) to plot the ways from.
If you need any help please just ask,
Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It looks like you've introduced a few errors here of various kinds. The first Way: A1270 (205938109) for example, you've changed an A road primary link to a bridleway.
Way: 466419200 has totally distorted a track.

It might be best to consider reverting the whole changeset.

Regards Bernard

Hello There AshBDH,

It is disconnected, please refresh your browser cache or reload the tab in your browser. Better still look at the way in the iD editor, that shows the current status of the database no matter the delay in re-rendering or your browser status.

I adjusted the line of Foggy Close to align with Digital Globe Imagery which now shows the estate partly built. Please see here :- osm.org/edit?editor=id&changeset=61714081#map=18/52.06138/-0.54216

Regards Bernard

No response so removed POI

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The POI you've added, shop=variety_store is placed in the middle of the road. With no name or address it is really of no value to OSM or its users. Could you add an address, name and reposition the POI. If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, does the public have access to the fitness_centre? If not it should be tagged as private.
Regards Bernard

Hi, you've duplicated a lot of these houses, maybe all of them. Removing the duplication's should be easy but if you need help let me know.
Regards Bernard.

Unless you can join the path to the highway network it is of no value to OSM. As such it ought be removed.
Regards Bernard

Hi the address interpolation was correct. I've reversed your amendment and remove duplicated address data from the building outline.

Hi the address interpolation was correct. I've reversed your amendment and remove duplicated address data from the building outline.

Hi, adjacent houses with party walls are best if joined together. Some of the one you've mapped have the party walls with gaps between them of even overlapping.
Regards Bernard