Hi, I've removed several instances of the tagging name=house and name=building as these names are not verifiable (fiction). Please read up on OSM best practice.
Regards Bernard

Hi, I removed the name=house as that's not likely the house name. Also removed the building outline from describing the building's shadow as well as the building.

Hi, I've retagged the POI as natural=tree, (as per OSM practice). Also removed the area.
Regards Bernard
May I respectfully suggest you read up a bit in order to give the best of your ability to the OSM project.

Hi, your play area was in a car park and not tagged as per OSM best practice. No problem I've removed it, just wanted to let you be aware.
Regards Bernard

Hi, you inadvertently duplicated a building. No problem I've removed it, just wanted to let you be aware.
Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've drawn the church building and put your POI tags on it.
Regards Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I looked at your addition to OSM because I noticed you had inadvertantly dragged a bollard out of place to the middle of the canal. This is replaced so all is well there. I've also drawn in the area of your center and placed the your tags on the outline. Hope this is OK regards Bernard

Web link removed as it has nothing to do with the building.

Hi, I notice there are several duplicated sections of fence as well.
Regards Bernard

Hello there, I'm pretty sure the fences don't go through the middle of these buildings. I've rectified a few of them, perhaps you could rectify the rest please.
Regards Bernard

Hi, it is a small area of woodland next to the road, not a park.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've reverted your recent changes to OSM. I think you may be unaware that you deleted a lot of artwork POI's from the area. All is now well but please be careful and not upload changes till you're sure of what's happening.

Regards Bernard

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've reinstated the building=yes tag as I suspect the feature is still a building. If the shop doesn't occupy the whole building then it ought to be represented by a POI node placed within the building. You might also consider keeping the building address on the building outline.

Also your payment tags could be improved with more explicit descriptors, please see :- payment=*

Regards Bernard

Fiction removed!

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Thanks for your contribution to OSM. Using disused is the OSM best practice, disused=*:
But you weren't to know that. I've changed the tags and added a link and note to show the changes (in case anyone re maps the pub).

Regards Bernard

Please have a look at this map it looks like the perfect place for your mapping :-
http://opengeofiction.net/#map=5/56.072/-3.252

This OpenStreetMap database is a live worldwide operation and your actions here are disruptive. You may one day rely on the information here being accurate.

Please have a look at this map it looks like the perfect place for your mapping :-
http://opengeofiction.net/#map=5/56.072/-3.252

This OpenStreetMap database is a live worldwide operation and your actions here are disruptive. You may one day rely on the information here being accurate.

Reverted fiction. Please see previous comment regarding fiction.

Reverted fiction. Please see previous comment regarding fiction.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It's really unfortunate that your first edit has gone a bit awry, but please don't let that deter you. Just have a look here first :- osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Problems, neither of the added nodes was tagged as a tree. The London node dragged a couple of footpaths out of position. The Richmone node was alone on a grass verge.
Because of the footpath problem I've reverted your changes/additions, thus replacing the footpaths where they originated.

I noticed that there were trees close to the two nodes you mapped, so anticipating this might have been your intention, I have added them to the map.
All is now well.

Regards Bernard