Postcodes fixed.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It's only the level crossing that's closed. From the Essex definitive map, the rest of the footpath is still open to the public.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your mapping is welcome here, but unfortunately, there are many problems. Buildings joined to highways. Buildings tagged as landuse. Lines tagged as river are used for the lake outline. Duplicated lines around the lake. Unsquared up buildings.

I've made a lot of corrections so it looks a lot better now. Could you please take a little time to Learn OSM's best practices of mapping? Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard

Hang On a bit.
I now realise your Brunswick Street is in Darlington, this location here is in London.

Am I correct in this assumption? If so I can correct the location for you. I'll wait for your response.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted this changeset because it removed a highway making it a business.

From your website, I added an office POI where I think the business is located.

Is this an online only business? The website mentions a showroom, where is this located please.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, the corridor Way: 1449670892 and footway Way: 1454639010, (both at level 1) are on top of each other and joined together at nodes 13340292812, 13340292813 and 12207678247,

The corridor Way: 1450130517 and the footway Way: 1454639011 (both tagged level1) are mostly on top of each other though not joined at nodes.

The corridor Way: 1450130520 and the footway Way: 1454639004 (both tagged level 0) are on top of each other and joined at Node: 13300525888.

There are other instances of footway and corridor on the same alignment but both being tagged as the same level.

The steps are tagged at differing levels but I think ought be tagged with the layer tag to describe the vertical relationships between crossing or overlapping elements. The level tags are not for this purpose.

Regards Bernard. (I hope this makes sense).

Duplicated highway removed.

Hi, the highways are still duplicated here in those corridors and footpaths on level 1 are on top of each other. I don't know the area, so can't correct it myself.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed these roads, Way: Kodashpally (1473548429), Way: Chandur (1473548430), Way: Shivanna Gudem (1473548432) because they duplicated existing highways which could disrupt routing. Please make corrections to the existing features.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed Way: Poleramma thalli temple road (1473554043), because it duplicates an existing highway which could disrupt routing. Please make any corrections to existing features.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You would be better off reporting that to the highway authority, you can report it via Fix My Street.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've placed your new 1.5 km roads, Way: 1473222162 and Way: 1473222161 across and on top of all the existing mapping. This surely can't be correct?

Are these proposed highways? If so, they should be tagged as such otherwise they could disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your location for the mosque is in the middle of a public park, I think it's unlikely to be situated here. The tagged postcode is for the properties on Ashburnham Road Close by.

Could you please respond to this comment and if you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, all the motorway highways and most of the footpaths you've added are duplicating existing highways. Such duplication of highways could seriously disrupt routing. Thus, I've removed all the duplications.

It's OSM practice to amend or correct existing features, not map over the top of the feature to make duplicates. I very much doubt if there are motorways on the college grounds. Also the names added look more like descriptions rather than formal names.

If you need any help, please just ask.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You inadvertently dragged a stream node, joining it to Westward Drive and the footpath. Also, the name of the building would not be 'resident'. I've amended/corrected these problems keeping your new data, I've also corrected the tags to the residential area.

If I can help in any way please just ask. Regards Bernard.

Hi, You'v been placing steps on top of sections of footpath. This makes for duplicated sections of highway which could affect routing.

I've removed quite a few of the duplicate sections.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, you've added many sections of duplicated highways by placing a new highway on top of an existing highway. This could cause disruption to routing.

If a highway needs correcting, please correct the existing highway. In this manner, the OSM history of the way will be maintained.

I've removed 17 sections of duplicated highway.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Everything added to OSM must be factual and verifiable by other folk. I've removed the name because not verifiable as per:- osm.wiki/Verifiability

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

From your website, your business POI is in the wrong place. I've moved the POI to 40 Bowling Green Lane. I've also reverted the changes made to the Buckley Building.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry to say, there are a few things wrong here. St Lukes is mapped to the NE Way: St. Luke's (38215816). I've removed the building from the park and reinstated the park's name.

Regards Bernard