BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 175816137 | I just noticed there was no layer tag on the bridge Way: 1457860143 |
|
| 175816137 | Hi, Your new highway Way: 1457860136 duplicates an existing highway; highway duplication could cause disruption to routing. Thus, I've removed it. The bridge Way: 1457860143 was also placed on top of an existing highway. I've removed this duplication. It's likely you could not notice the duplication as the changeset was quite large. Regards Bernard, |
|
| 175782179 | Hi, Again you are duplicating highways which will disrupt routing. Way: 6 (1457648079) is a duplication of several existing highway, I've removed it. You should have been alerted to the problem by the warnings given above. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 175747118 | Hi, we are talking about layer tags here. layer tags are relative only to what feature they are above or below. They have no relation to the levels of a building. The service roads are only above a highway tagged as layer=-1, therefore, they must be layer=0. The layer=0 tag is not usually needed as it is implied in it's absence. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 175712878 | This are is within an existing mapped residential area, thus it's not needed. I've removed it. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 175712583 | Hi, The scool sports pitch would not be named Sports Center. I've made corrections. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 175712215 | Hi, The garden would not be named Parkview Road, and it doesn't need the area=yes tag. The tags should be access=private
Regards Bernard. |
|
| 175711223 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. A few points, the house name would not be 51, that's only the house number. In the absence of a oneway=no tag, it is implied that the road is two-way; no need for that tag. I've made corrections. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 173867255 | Welcome to OSM. Many problems with the footpath Way: 1445697788. It crosses over highways and buildings, for the most part along lines of existing paths. Thus I;ve removed it. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 175607993 | I've removed several long sections og duplicated highway as this dirupts routing. Please amend correct the existing highway. |
|
| 175608239 | You are still making duplicate highways, which will disrupt routing. Please amend/correct existing features, not just draw over them. |
|
| 175608239 | You are still making duplicate highways, which will disrupt routing. Please amend/correct existing features, not just draw over them. |
|
| 175606407 | A single tree is not a wood. |
|
| 175576454 | Hi,
I check India and several other countries I'm interested in daily to keep routing working OK for folk. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 175576454 | Duplicated highway sections removed. Please don't duplicate any highway, it disrupts routing. |
|
| 175601167 | Hi,
|
|
| 175498477 | Hi, You made lots of duplicated highway sections on the car parking service roads. I thin I've corrected/removed them all. Please try not to map any sections twice. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 175542440 | Hi, You made lots of duplicate sections of footpaths here. I think I've corrected/removed all of them. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 175440667 | Hi, I've just removed about 30 sections of duplicated service highways. Please do not double back over a highway when you map it. It doesn't matter how many sections it is made up of, but do not over sections. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 175468650 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Isn't there a short section of Shooters Hill east and west of the junction to Academy Road that is also a 20mph limit? Perhaps you could check this and amend OSM please? Regards Barnard. |