Hi Matt,
I looked at the PRoW map to determine the route of FP 31 where the service road is also the PRoW. Is there still a problem with FP 30? If so, can you fix it, or can I help?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Review, placing a footpath highway on top of an existing service road, (highway Way: 328465346) makes for duplication of highways. Two highways on the same line, this duplication could cause disruption of routing. The one highway can hold in it's tags all information pertaining to the service road and the PRoW. I've now made this amendment removing the extra highway, it's here:- way/328465346#map=18/53.211465/-1.925098&layers=N

If you need more clarification or any other help please just ask, in the comments here or message me.

Regards Bernard.

That's strange because they show in imagery of 2025. There's nothing wrong with internal factory roads being shown on OpenStreetMap, indeed they are shown other maps as well.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted the road status back from unclassified to primary as I can see no reason to lower its status.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The roads can clearly be seen and even if they are private they are still features that can be mapped to OSM. Thus I've reinstated them. I have however tagged the two gates as access=private which means the public has no open access beyond them.

The ways can be seen to be accessed by vehicle thus they are for descriptive purposes highways.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the highway Way: Road (1449568860) because it duplicates an existing highway. Please make any amendments/corrections to the existing feature, not merely map over it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed several sections of duplicated highways which could have caused disruption to routing.

Another duplicated section of highway, Way: 1449648488 fixed.

Hi,
Another duplicated section of highway on Way: 1449630975, which I've corrected.

Hi Jazz,
Another problem is with crossing highways, these should be differentiated with the layer tag so that routing will understand which highway is above or below another. Indoor highways would then have both a level and layer tag.

In several of your changesets you've made duplicated sections of highways, (highway on top of another highway). This duplication could cause disruption to routing. I've corrected many of these instances.

Regards Bernard.

That was changeset/174514219

When I realised what I'd done, I reverted the changeset.

Hi, Way: 1448479823 duplicated an existing highway, so I've removed it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, you dragged a couple of roads out of alignment, joining them to the turn circle. I've corrected them, so all's OK now.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, the following stated highways all had duplicated sections, five warnings were given above about this problem. Duplicating sections of highways will disrupt routing and should be avoided. I've removed the duplicated sections.
Way: 1448453646, Way: 1448453657, Way: 1448453648, Way: 407920854, Way: 314988752

Uploading changesets that involve so many (142) feature edits means that you nor anyone else can easily see any problems. It's best to limit changesets to 20 or less edited features. Thus you can more easily see any mistakes.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I'm just letting you know that someone removed the node/point that you added to OSM because it held no information. Thus of no value to the OSM database. OSM is a live worldwide database containing ground truth information.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Three sections of duplicated highway in this changeset which I've corrected/removed.
Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Regarding 73 Southfield Road and the tag addr:housename=73 Southfield Road, the name is not 73 Southfield Road nor is it 73, it has no name. The dwelling is an end terrace house not a semi-detached house. also the city is London not "London Borough of Ealing".

The above-mentioned points also pertain to numbers 71, 69, 67, 65, 63, 61, and 59.

Lastly the dwellings a terraced houses, they are joined by party walls. There are no gaps between them.

I've made amendments so that the terrace is mapped to OSM practice. I hope you can see/understand what I've done. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please be more careful in your mapping.

This highway duplicates existing highways and would not have many illogical tags, (highway, waterway, railway).

Thus, I've reverted it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The tags you added to the school building were already on the school grounds outline as per OSM practice. Thus I've removed the duplicated info from the building.

Regards Bernard.