I've removed the Coop brand and operator tags.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I see you've mapped the whole building as the business, it was previously described as a house. So the question is does the business really occupy the whole building? If not then the business should be represented by a node/POI placed within the house outline. I would think it's actually a contact office, I can help with this if you like.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Several highway sections of the park run were placed on top of existing highways. This made duplication of highways that could cause disruption of routing. I've removed the duplicate sections and amended the route relation to suit.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The pub is already mapped as an outline of the premises, Way: The Regal (1204234283). I've removed the POI as it's duplication of data.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You inadvertently squared up the long boundary line Way: 449518772. I've reinstated it to the original position so all is well.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I just wanted to point out, in case you missed it, that there are several problems in this changeset as noted in the warnings above. I've removed several sections of duplicated cycleway which could have impacted on routing. I've not looked at the other problems.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The church building is alreaddy mapped so I've added you new tags to it. OSM policy is "One feature, one OSM element", please see:- osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM maps ground truth, what is physically present at a place, and it must be verifiable to others who pass by. So I wonder, is there actually a language school here or is it an office in the bungalow? I can see no evidence of a school.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The business doesn't occupy the whole building, so I've reverted the building tags. I added the tag office=financial to your POI.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Good start to your mapping, that's actually two houses, I've amended.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I made several alterations to your added footpaths mainly to conform to OSM best practice. There were many crossing but unjoined highways, (footpaths crossing over existing highways unjoined), all fixed. Many places where footpaths joined onto land area outlines, (residential and building area outlines), all fixed.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I think you made this amendment at the wrong place, so I've reverted it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I forgot to say that yes I agree the path line looks very strange. It's also joined to many other land features which is poor mapping.

Hi, This changeset merely removed the section of highway (path) that coincided with the bridge (Way: Amjilosa to Sekathum (1328739649), which was a duplication of the highway. It made very minimal changes to the positions of six nodes. The bridge was originally added in Changeset: 96218307, four years ago. My changes were to the existing mapping.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, you've somehow mapped a lot of features near here that are not tagged. Could you please rectify this issue?

Regards Bernard

Hi, Thanks for the info, I've now tagged it as a house and added a note of the former use.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If the building remains it ought not be deleted. Rather the tags for the closed amenity should be changed to disused. I think the building remains so I've reinstated it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The AED position in the middle of these woods far from public access or any highway or habitation, seems strange. It's far from the Norfolk Show Ground. You tag as access=yes, but by whom, when, and how? Thus the question, is this position correct? Who, how and when can it be accessed?

Need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the duplicated sections of highway you added as it could disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately your new highway duplicated the existing highway which cause problems with routing. Thus I've reverted this changeset, all is now OK.

Regards Bernard.