OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
170022237

Hi, These two ways:- Way: Charnwood Forest Line (1420238187) and Way: Charnwood Forest Line (1420238186) duplicated existing ways so I've removed them.

Is there any online evidence, a map, of the cycleway?

Regards Bernard.

170084797

Please do not use a description for the name tag, it's against OSM best practice.

Regards Bernard.

170067443

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There does not seem to be a building at this position. This point is far from Anson's Lane and the postcode centroid. Could you please reposition the building or remove it. If you need help please just ask/comment here.

Regards Bernard.

170057122

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The business doesn't occupy the entire building, so I've made it a POI and added the website.

Regards Bernard.

169943559

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM maps only verifiable ground truth features. I don't think there could be a business of any kind in this courtyard. As you state, the company is an online store; therefore, it is not suitable to be added to OSM, as there is nothing there for the public to access. Thus, I've removed the node.

If you do have verifiable premises somewhere,e they could be mapped.

Regards Bernard.

169888726

Hi, Thanks for the info, reverted and joined at the north end.

Regards Bernard.

169872940

Hi, I can see no evidence for the highways you've added here. Can you please show or state the evidence you have for their existence. They look more like plain field boundaries. If they are fiction, please remove them.

You're very welcome to add genuine features to OpenStreetMap.

Regards Bernard.

169744861

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The building is mapped as tourism=hostel so a separate node is not needed. It's the YHA London St Pancras.

Regards Bernard.

169674449

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately you placed a new highway on top of the 'highway under construction' making duplication of the highways. It's OSM practice that amendments/corrections to features, (highways) are made where possible (here) to the existing feature. Thus duplication is avoided and all mapping history of the feature is maintained.

I've removed the duplicates, updating features with your new info, all's now well.

Regards Bernard.

169692923

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetap.

That's three houses, not just number 8. I've now mapped the houses so the addresses can be added properly

Regards Bernard.

169657033

Hi, Can you please state why you've removed most of the buildings, paths and grass areas within the residential area of Way: 866887037? It's here:- changeset/93523965#map=18/51.491531/-0.164950&layers=N

Regards Bernard.

169624596

Duplicate highway removed. It's roadworks not road construction and the sidewalk is not affected. To short a time scale to be any help to OSM users as it would be finished before maps could be updated. Plus would you remember to come back and correct the edit.

Regards Bernard

169558567

Hi, I've removed these three track sections:- Way: 1417733003, Way: 1417733004 and Way: 1417733002 because they duplicated the existing track.

Regards Bernard.

169495780

Hi, I've reinstated the building. No need to delete it, just amend the tags to remove the business. All OK now.

Regards Bernard.

169492030

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The business is not the whole building so I've made it a POI node within the building. Building tags are reverted.

Regards Bernard.

169419611

Duplicated highway removed

169396077

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You placed the path on top of an existing residential highway. This is duplication of highway which could disrupt routing. Thus I've removed the path. If a way needs correcting please correct any existing highway not just map on top of it.

Regards Bernard.

169443233

Unjoin fuel area outline from the center line of footways.

169419355

Several features were dragged out of alignment here, I think I've fixed them all.

169382298

Hi, in welcoming you to OpenStreetMap I ask you to please only upload genuine features. I've reverted this changeset because it only added fiction and added nodes to other features that did not need them.

Regards Bernard.