Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I see you've somehow added three defibrillators in close proximity, which doesn't really look right. I would think that the only defibrillator is the one on the car park, is this correct? If so the other two can be removed.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry but your landuse=residential area covers a lot of other different types of areas. Thus I've removed it. The tag landuse=residential is used when mapping land areas used only as residential.

The boundary line for Marlborough is here:- relation/3411516.

If you could explain what you hoped to achieve maybe I could help.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Can you please show or point out the verification as to the permitted bicycle access on these two tank tracks. If there is legal access for cycles I would think there is also pedestrian access. If there's no legal access by statute or permission then folk could face prosecution for entering. So as I said could you please verify the access.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, There doesn't look like this business is located here in the road. Only verifiable ground truth features should be added to the OSM database. So this feature should be properly mapped or removed. Do you need any help?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You actually only dragged the road out of alignment which I've reinstated. Do you need help adding a business?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've tweaked the area and joined the drive to Milverton Road.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reinstated the correct tags to Manor Lane. Also made a few tweaks. Please don't alter the OSM data in order suit personal preferences.

Regards Bernard.

Squared up the buildings.

Hi, But cycles are allowed.

Please don't alter OSM mapping to suit your GPS navigation. This makes it difficult for those folk who want to navigate a different route. OSM strives to have only verifiable ground truth in the database.

Regards Bernard,

Hello, Your new highway Way: شارع ٢٤ 1348997741) does not appear on the imagery you have used. Is this road proposed or under construction?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I just wanted to inform you that ways 720603345 and 720603350 are untagged.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've unjoined the houses from the path and another area outline. I also squared up the houses. The squareing up of houses is easy with the ideditor. You just highlight/lrft-click the house, then right click and click the square icon, shortcut Q. It's done.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your requested review, I've reverted your changes because you removed the valid farmyard tag and added the fictional tag making the farmyard scrub.

Please don't add fiction to the live worldwide OSM database from which hundreds of maps are compiled daily.

Regards Bernard

Hi, I've removed the fords as I believe they are fiction.

Hi, These grass areas don't extend over asphalt roads and paths. Not do they join onto the center lines of highways. Because it would obstruct traffic.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Some of your newly added fences do not seem to make science, fences and gates in the middle of what looks like open fields. Also some fences cross over others with no join. Could you please look at this problem?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've got a large wood area Way: 866283146 on top of a large scrub area Way: 1348072288. This doesn't seem logical, I think it should be wood or scrub not both. Could you please re-think these areas.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've added the address and website, please check.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If it's a farm access road then the tag would be access=agricultural. The tag vehicle:access=no would exclude public vehicles but remember some routers would stop delivery vehicles fro accessing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If there is some form of access then the tag access=no would be incorrect. You have added the tag motor_vehicle=no which excludes public vehicle access, that's correct. It looks like the general access tag should be access=agricultural, thus I've amended the tag.

Regards Bernard.