BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 144632328 | Hi, You've mapped the gardens over all the building which isn't correct, there's no garden where the buildings are situated. You could make multipolygon relations so that the buildings are inner areas of the garden. Thus the garden is not across the building area. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 144597553 | Hi, I've looked at correcting the problem for you but the lanes tags are all mixed up. Not being local I can't tell how it should be. Thus I've removed the duplicate/triplicate way. Please put the corrected tags on the existing way. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 144623561 | duplicate removed |
|
| 144644966 | Hi, Building heights are in meters. I don't think this is 75M tall if there are only 2 floors |
|
| 144644650 | duplicate removed |
|
| 144644982 | Fiction names removed. |
|
| 144645146 | Duplicated roads removed. |
|
| 144623476 | Fiction motorway removed. |
|
| 144650495 | Hi, Two intermittent streams you recently added are not connected to the Bavali River at their north ends. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 144522575 | Hi, You've mapped this highway on top of an existing highway, making duplication which disrupts routing. Please see my comments at changeset/144597553 on how to rectify this problem. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 144597553 | Hi, There's a problem here with your new way High Street (1227225136). Firstly you've mapped it as doubling back over itself. Secondly you've mapped it on top of the existing way, High Street (511294158), to which side roads join. This makes for duplication of highways, disrupting routing. If a way needs correcting/amending it's OSM practice to correct the existing way rather than mapping a new way. Thus the history of the way is maintained. Could you please remove your new (duplication) section of highway High Street (1227225136) and make the correcting/amending to the existing highway. Need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 144525320 | These are private domestic gardens. |
|
| 144424339 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please remember to revert the change when the road re-opens. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 143872778 | Hi, Your wood area is mapped within a larger wood area relation/8355672 Thus your new area is a duplication which I've removed. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 144215172 | You've also tagged these tracks as residential highways which is obviously incorrect. |
|
| 144215172 | Hi, You made lots of duplicated highways, which I;ve removed. Please take heed of and correct the warnings. above. There are reported 50 instances of un-connected highways, these are of no use to OSM in this manner. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 144124632 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've removed 10 duplicated highways which you mapped, these would have disrupted routing. Please learn OSM best practices and also check your mapping before uploading. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 144121787 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please take time to read the guides to OSM mapping. I've just removed many instances of duplicated highways that you added to OSM. There are warnings above of 77 problems. I've also removed many fictitious names that actually looked like descriptions, (minor road). I've removed other duplicated features, (clinics) and several POI's placing relevant info from them onto the buildings. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 144169921 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. An OSM element should represent a single on-the-ground feature once and only once. Thus I've removed the POI node and placed the node info on the shop outline. Regards Bernard, |
|
| 144148379 | Hi, Please consider making route relations for these routes. The reason is that you now have sections of duplicated paths. Where two routes share a single path line there should only be one path mapped, then the one section of path is added to each route relation. Duplicating highways should be avoided as it disrupts routing. Regards Bernard. |