Hi, yes welcome, another observation is that this way has ended up duplicated. When the status of the way is resolved the duplicated way should be removed.
Regards Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
OSM is a live worldwide database, we add features ti that are verifiable on the ground for other folk to make good maps. Your addition was obviously a test or an inadvertent addition so I've removed it. Regards

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I just wanted to point out that the area (please see here :- way/464178639#map=17/51.45434/-0.15097), you added has no descriptive tags and thus adds nothing to the database. Map compilers don't know what it is so it's ignored. Could you describe the area's usage with tags please? Regards

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
There are problems with this footpath. You've not connected it to the road at south, it's drawn across a house into back gardens. Would you please look at and correct it? Need any help just ask. I can remove it for you if it's not repairable?

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Well I'm sorry to say that addition has gone wrong. The footpath in part duplicates Mercator Road, then cuts twice across a building. Would you like to have a look and make corrections? If you need help please just ask, I'll await your response. If no response I'll remove the way in a while.
Regards.

Hi. There are no footways, footpaths or pavements for pedestrians in Nightingale Close. I've tagged foot use of the highway.
The ways around Scotch Hill are paths, informal pedestrian ways on a desire line. Footways are a formal way usually a pavement or sidewalk, specifically constructed for pedestrian use.

No response so removed as no information can be gained.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I removed the address from the building, as it has several addresses for many areas of the building. Placed address and extra details on the POI.

Sorry forgot to mention the duplicate I removed as well.

Yes welcome to OSM. Actually the facility is already mapped and all information is on the building outline. It is tagged as amenity=social_club, so I have removed your POI so as not to duplicate the information, hope that's OK.

Hi, I've drawn in a house from Bing imagery around that node, tagged it as a house and noted that you shelter there. Please check and add any other info you can.

OK, removed.

There are still many problems with your mapping. Now I see gates mapped as linear features. A gate is an impediment/barrier to a way, not a way it's self. The tag barrier=gate should be placed on a single node of either a barrier or highway, or an intersection of a barrier and a highway, please see :- barrier=gate

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
These two additions look like fiction, a nightclub in a grassed park, a highway rest area in the middle of a street. You either had a very good night or a very bad one.
I have removed the features, however if you can show me wrong I'll gladly apologise and put the back.
Regards

Hello there, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Untagged way/463240250 that just goes out into a field, was that inadvertent, can it be removed?

Many inaccuracy's were left, I've repaired as many as I can easily see.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Unfortunately this changeset has made two highways over the same route, a footway and a cycleway. To the South East one reaches the road the other doesn't. The route across this field (as shown on the OS map) is a designated right of way being a public footpath. There are also "Public Footpath" signs enroute.
It needs to be sorted out, if I can help please just ask. Regards Bernard

Hello there, are you sure this building is named correctly? OS map has the name as Laurel Farm.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
OSM is a live worldwide database from which folk compile maps. It is imperative that the data we add is correct, factual and verifiable on the ground.
You show good skills in adding features to the database. But with the exception of the two buildings it looks like what you have added is fiction or the marking of your own private data. Thus it's best if these changes are reverted. I can revert the database back to its original state if you wish, but keeping the two buildings. I'll wait a while to let you respond before doing this.
If I can help with OSM mapping please just ask. Regards.

Hello There, It's usual to split the highway into sections to accommodate changes in the highways characteristics, be that a change in sidewalk, speed limit, name change or designation etc. As for sidewalks (pavements to the side of roads usually separated from the carriageway by a kerb) it's usual for them to be tagged as part of the highway (left, right, both) when they actually adjoin the highway, like (I think) in the cases you've mapped. When the pavement/footway/path is separated from the highway by a physical feature, (wide grass verge or some barrier) then map the footway as a separate feature.
I hope that helps, any questions please just ask.
Regards Bernard