Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The name "Paston Way" is actually tagged in the route relation so that all sections of the Way are named in one tag. Therefore it is not necessary to individually name each section.

Regards Bernard.

No response so POI removed.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please read up on OSM practices before adding to the live worldwide data base from which many maps are compiled.

I think your intention is to advertise your business, this can be done by adding genuine verifiable data. The single node you added to a park/allotment boundary tagged with fiction is not the proper way to add a feature. The tagged website is also fiction as it is "coming soon".

I'll revert your changes for you. Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There are problems with the features youve added to the OSM database. You have made amendments to an administrative boundary by joining your trail to it.
The trail you added is for the greater part a duplication.
The plot node you added does not really describe anything, a plot is usually an area of land rather than a pinpoint. Plots can be named (indeed many plots are named in the UK), but your name (FR1001) looks like a reference code. Further you have added this node to a highway route relation, fortunately the node is meaningless so will not disrupt the relation.

Because of the many problems I think it best to revert your changeset, I can do this if you wish.

If you need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard.

Hi, your POI is of no value to OSM as there are no true descriptive tags, name. English tags ought to be predominant in the UK. Chinese tags should be marked as such.

Regards Bernard.

Surveyed on a walk.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Are you sure the park is located here? Using the Esri World Imagery in the iD editor that you added the park with, you will see the park is drawn over a house.

Could you please check and amend, if you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reinstated the building and tagged the name and office as disused. This because the building and address are still there. Disused will inform other folk of the correct state of affairs, a former estate agent. This is OSM usual practice that you were obviously unaware of.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, there's a lot to learn about OSM mapping practices. Eight years and I'm still learning new things.

I've removed your duplicate building and placed your new data on the existing building outline.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

In adding address details to this building you have inadvertently duplicated the building outline. The original building (Way: 347084099) is still there with your new building (Way: Radiant White Orchid (678071983)) on top as a duplication.

It is OSM good practice to amend existing ways, POI or features so that a complete history is maintained. Thus your new data should have been an amendment to the existing feature.

A correction needs to be made at least to remove duplication, preferably to the practice I mention above. I can easily make this correction if you wish and will do so if in due course I hear nothing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, there is still not enough information to verify the business at this position which actually looks to be on the highway. There is no address on the website to verify the business.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've un-joined these areas from the centre line of the highway.

Hi, I have removed your tag landuse=farmland from the bank, and reinstated amenity=bank.

Hello There,

I just wanted to let you know that you are adding a lot of single untagged nodes. These are probably inadvertently being added at the exact same place as some of your path nodes.
Please have a look here to see what I mean:- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-0.17816&lat=51.50680&zoom=11&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way please zoom in on the red triangles and see that in some cases there are several problem nodes.

If you need help removing these nodes just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi you've added several ways and nodes without tagging them, could you please correct or remove these?

You added one building and placed a path to run through it, this also needs correcting.

You added an untagged area and joined it to a highway center line.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
I just wanted to let you know that Way: Dulwich Wood Park (673006335) (a short section) is duplicated. There are several route relations involved so it's not a case of just deleting. It looks like you have recently edited here so I wonder if you could have a look.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the fiction you inadvertently uploaded.

The two extra ways are now removed.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Features added to the OSM database must be verifiable to other users.
I notice your new POI is placed on a highway it is doubtful if this is correct, therefore not verifiable. You give no address, website or contact detail so that verifiability can be checked even though your stated source is a website.

As such the added data is of no benefit to the public nor your business. Thus the data should be amended or removed. If the business is situated near here it would be appropriate to draw the building as well. If you need any help please just ask.

Further the relation you added (with just a highway) serves no purpose so should be removed.

Regards Bernard.

Two parking points removed, added service road, amended parking poi.