Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Just a few observations as you requested a review. There's much to learn about OSM and it can't all be done easily, I'm still learning.

Pelican tag is perfect.
I removed the untagged area keeping the tree, (just the tree node is OK).
The house addresses are OK, I think it best to tag them as building=house because that conveys both building type (residential) and individual dwelling (house). I've squared them all up to the road. But the question is are they separated houses or a terrace ,(with all houses joined together by a party walls)? It might be difficult making a terrace block in the iD editor. I can help if you wish? I use the JOSM editor which, once learnt makes this sort of task easy.

Regards Bernard.
PS don't let comments put you off!

OK then could you please take a look at and amend the map because there are now two number 11 houses.
One of them must be wrong.
Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I think you might be mistaken as to which house is number 11.
What you have done is change number 15 to 11, thus there are now two number 11's and no number 15.
I am fairly sure that number's 11 and 15 were correctly placed so your change should be modified. Would you like help to do this?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, does the company really operate from this small garage and if so can you verify this as the official office and address. Your website has no address on it, nor can I find the company registration.
If this POI is fiction would you please remove it, if you can verify it my apologies.

Regards Bernard

That should read as a gate.

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've reverted this changeset because you inadvertently moved a gat onto a road junction, then added address data to it.
Your POI to the south remains.

Regards Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The multipolygon for the building was unnecessary so I have removed it. Then joined the three outer building sections into one outline. Lastly placed the tags from the multipolygon onto the building.

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Can you please confirm that the houses within the area enclosed by Way: 50668413 have been removed and the landuse changed? Would you mind also giving the source of your information?

As far as I'm aware this is a recently developed residential area so it's a surprised to see this change.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, slight amendment to the opening hours to suit OSM best practice.
Regards Bernard

Area now revised as best I can from images. Duplications, self intersections and items on top of each other rectified.

Hi, looks OK now if you'd like to check please? I changed some PRoW refs bridleways are usually marked BR, I don't know why DCC mark them as BW, (BW is for a ByWay).
Regards Bernard

Hi, It's a little bit tricky, I'll look at it again later on today, Saturday, and comment again here. Regards.

Hello DaveD, this is the OSM Inspector (routing layer) link that drew my attention to the problem, http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-1.98793&lat=53.37353&zoom=16&overlays=duplicate_ways

Regards Bernard

Hi, just wanted to let you know that parts of the way you've recently added are in fact duplicating an existing way (Way: Sett Valley Trail (636039419)). It's best in cases like this to amend the existing way thus keeping all history of changes.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I removed your untagged node because being untagged it has no value to the OSM database. If I can help in any way please just ask by commenting here.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, you placed the untagged Way: 268017686 on top of existing ways, I've removed it for you.
Way: 638994828 you tagged a node instead of the path, I've rectified this.

Regards Bernard

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Unless there is a specific restriction it is taken that pedestrians can use a trunk road in the UK. So I've removed foot=yes from this section and added a crossing point that I can see on the Bing image.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, your new POI is placed on a footpath between buildings. It would be nicer if you could place it on the appropriate building and perhaps add an address or website.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I see you've removed the name only, ought the amenity node be removed as well?

Regards Bernard.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I joined the party walls of the terrace you added.

Regards Bernard