Hi, I've amended the junction where the three roads head north, matching it as closely to the Bing image as I could.

I have split the primary highway at roughly where you had your speed markers and tagged the highway as maxspeed=20. Now router software will take notice of the speed limit on that section of road.
Is the 20 speed limit in KPH please???

Regards Bernard

Hi, the "highway=motorway_junction" tag on Node: 1652765719 is confusing as it is on a junction between a primary and a tertiary highway. If there's no motorway then there's likely no need for a junction tag.

Similarly the few nodes tagged as junctions to the SW are IMHO not needed.
Regards

Hi, a Zebra crossing (Node: 5113090051) has several wide black and white stripes painted on the highway, I cannot see any stripes on any aerial image. If the crossing lacks these stripes it should just be tagged as highway=crossing.
Regards

Also your 20 speed limit sign Node: Max speed (5113273875) is not joined to the highway. It is therefore ignored as, on it's own it is not designating a highway for the restricting limit to be applied to.
20 as a Maxspeed is 20kph, that's rather slow for a primary highway or is it because of the school?

Hi, at junction Node: 1651249775 three highways join the junction but the aerial image seems to indicate that the three ways join prior to the junction with only one way going roughly north from the primary road.

Also Way: 525847468 does not join onto Way: Qaravəlli əsas yol (151563580).

Also Way: 525847473 does not join onto Way: 525620908. Again I can help if you wish.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I notice that there is a duplication of ways (one way directly on top of a second way). This is at the west ends of Way: 525847472 and Way: 525847471 where they join onto Way: Qaravəlli əsas yol (151563580).
I can help fix this if you wish.
Regards Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I appreciate that you wanted to add your farm walk onto OSM and the manner (as far as you were aware) is excellent. However the entire route duplicates existing highways. OSM is a live worldwide database which your walk is now a part of. Unfortunately maps and software that use this data are now incorrect, (duplication's that also have differing descriptions).
If you can show that the farm walk is recognized by the public and verifiable on the ground as such then the walk could be added to the database as a relation. A relation of the segments of existing ways that it uses. This does however entail much more work to achieve.
To conclude, the changes ought to be reverted. I can make that reversion for you if you wish which might be better. I can also help you put the walk route on the map if you wish, providing it meets requirements.
Regards Bernard

Thanks

Hi, thanks for the comment, yes my mistake trying to to quickly with my two finger typing.
I tried altering it between your above comments and was going to say I think JOSM actually allowed akt:name= but on amending now it warned against alt:name= I have now amended it to alt_name= All now OK.
By the way how did you spot it?
Regards & Thanks Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Just wanted to let you know that Knights Way has been drawn over a footpath without joining to it.
Regards Bernard

Hello,
If Knighys Way is private then the tag access=private should be added to the way not included in the name tag. Then add permitted access (to allow for access onto the footpath that Knights Way crosses). Also the road/footpath junction ought to be joined up.
Regards Bernard

Hi your new way crosses an existing cycleway, if they phisically join on the ground then this ought to be represented in OSM.
Regards Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The school name and website are on the school area outline so don't need to be added again.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The fact that swimming_pool does not show as blue on the cycle map has nothing to do with the OSM database but rather the specific way the cycle map is rendered. We are requested to map what is on the ground not map to show up certain coulers for features. (The powers that be could show the blue rendering.)
However there is nothing wrong with adding more tags that do fully describe features. The feature is a natural pond rather than a pool which is usually constructed. So
leisure=swimming
natural=water
sport=swimming
water=pond
all describe the feature well and thus should render blue on the cycle map.
It would not have been appropriate to change a leisure=swimming pool tag to a water=pond on a constructed swimming pool.
Regards Bernard

Hello There and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've drawn in some house outlines in that road so the houses could be numbered rather than the road, making it a lot better.
If you don't want to do the numbering I could do it if you give me a few building number positions.
Regards Bernard
PS I've drawn in the pub and included opening times from it's website.

Hello, are the fields really named f1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6. These numbers might refer to area designations but not necessarily be actual names.
Also a similar query for the lake, is it really named "lake"? If it is then should it be capitalised to "Lake"
Regards Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I think you might have made a mistake. Is there really a huge pond in that back garden? If not then could you please remove it. Regards Bernard

Hello I just wanted to let you know that your recently added cycleway (Way: 523284869) is placed on top of a footway (Way: 4356852) that has been in the database for many years. Thus a duplication occurs.
I see, from the history that the footpath has in the past been tagged as a cycleway. Also that the footpath shows the way as part of a named route the Wandle Trail.
I think that the way, with all designations (names, refs, use), could/should be mapped as a single highway.
If I can be of any help please just ask, Regards Bernard