Left joined together they could disrupt routing.

Hi, it seems that you've got footways of different layers joined together. If the paths are separated by height, they shouldn't be joined.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The college is already mapped here:- way/1332635900 Thus I've removed your duplicate area.

I've also amended the tagging to the scouts ground.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry to say your correction was to create a duplicate highway. The correct correction was to rename the existing section of highway, thus keeping the previous history intact and not disrupting routing.

I've removed the duplicate way and renamed the existing way. Please check.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed Way: Gamraj-Dhobiwan road (1415149377) because it duplicated another highway which could disrupt routing. Please be careful not to duplicate highways.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've changed the business to a POI instead of the whole building.

Hi, I've reverted this change because it dragged other features out of alignment and was itself self-intersecting.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Sorry to inform you that the footpaths placed on top of existing highways is duplication of a highway, which could cause disruption of routing. Please, if a way needs correcting/amending it's OSM best practice to correct the existing way, thus the way's history is maintained and routing preserved.

I've removed ten footpath sections that duplicated existing highways and tagged the existing highway sections to reflect the public footpath status.

Regards Bernard.

Reverted to remove duplicated highway.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted this changeset because it dragged highways out of position. This could have disrupted routing.

Regards Bernard.

Fiction removed and highway placement reinstated.

Hi, Several of your new residential were mapped on top of existing residential areas in very strange shapes. A couple of other areas were dragged out of shape. I've removed the problems, and the map looks OK now.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The tag leisure=park infers a park open to the public for recreation, which I don't think these are. Thus, I've removed those two tags. I've added the tag leisure=dog_park to the POI in the area that looks like the dog park.

Regards Bernard.

Hi. Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunatly you new highways included some that were duplications of existing highways, Way: 1412126937, Way: 1412126936 and Way: 1412126948. I've removed these duplications as they could cause disruption to routing. I've also made several corrections/amendments to NH81, adding bridges etc.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately several sections of your highways were duplicated, which I've now removed. Please don't place a highway section on top of any other highway; it could disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The website link diesn't work, I've removed it.

Fictional bridge removed, Way:1410976204.

Hi, Only formal verifiable names should be used, thus I've removed names.

Also building should not cross over each other. Buildings are better/neater when squared up.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The street address is simply Quebec Way. I've amended.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It is likely that the first mapper of the path was aware that bicycles were not permitted. Also the landowner might not want cycling on their land. Therefore, unless you to definitely know that bicycles are allowed then the tag should remain. Routers don't always work as desired so we should not alter OSM data to try and help them. A good router will not route a bicycle through a bicycle=no tag.

Regards Bernard.