Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed your 2 sections of Main Road because they duplicate existing highways, duplication can cause problems with routing.

Regards Bernard.

A lot of these buildings have been duplicated, I think I've removed all duplicates.

Hi, Your new buildings would be look better if they were squared up. If you zoom in you can more precisely outline the buildings, then highlight/select the outline, right click menu, click the square icon, (shortcut Q).

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The access=private tag on it's own is all that's needed it implies that all forms of access are private and there is no public access.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the path because it duplicates an existing highway.

please see previu]ous changeset comment.

Hi, Suspicious names have been removed. Please only map formal or verifiable names for buildings.

Squaring up the buildings makes them better presented.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Your fictional duplicated highway has been removed.

Hi, Just a bit more help, your premises can be easily seen on the Bing or Esri imagery in the iD editor. In that editor the Bing imagery can be selected via the Background Settings button on the right side of the page.

The location is better placed on the website store locator.

Hi, On the roundabout, of which Way: Llantrisant Road (1317471353) is a part, there are now several duplicated sections of highway. The route relations are mixed up in the duplicated sections. This will cause disruption to routing.

Could you please try to remedy the problems? I don't have enough knowledge to make corrections.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed several duplicated highways that you mapped. Please if an existing way needs amending/correcting do the edit to the existing way. Thus the ways history remains.

Placing a footpath on top of a service road duplicates the highway which can disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just a couple of things, firstly all land in the UK is private, in that it is owned by someone. So there's no real need to point your private land.

We map ground truth in OSM so I've retagged the name as a description and moved the tag to the relation as per OSM practice. That's relation: 16470013.

I assume you make sure the public using the bridleway east of the woods are safe from any shooting.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended your mapping to suit OSM practice.

Is the shop Elms Trophies & Engravers still operating from your address? If not it should be removed.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, You are making things a lot worse instead of better. The problems I mentioned before have not been addressed and you've moved the admin boundary again. You also now have a drain joined to a highway, and highways layer=0 joined to a bridge layer=1.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Thanks for letting me know about this. It was my fault, I removed the long original way instead of the short section of new way. I've reinstated the way.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately you mapped your three paths on top of existing highways. This would disrupt routing. I've removed the duplicate highways and amended the existing highways tags to show them used by foot.

Regards Bernard.

No response, so as there were several self-intersections which could not be resolved without making even more problems I removed Way: 1313870887.

The corridor needs to be mapped without self-intersections, perhaps in several sections or multipolygons.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've made a few tweaks to address your points and amended some tags to suit OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

That; 's the outline of a building part, the building address tags are already on the building outline.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

That's an agricultural storage pad, even if folk park there it's not a car park.

Regards Bernard.