Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The feature you named is not a wall nor is it named The Wall, it is the outline of a private parkland. The sections of the outline that are walls are separately tagged as such. I've removed your tag 'The Wall'.

Regards Bernard.

Fiction removed.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Way: 1300894018 was drawn with some self-intersections making duplicated sections of the highway. This would cause routing problems. I've made corrections but could you please be aware of this?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've corrected several highway problems including unjoing highways that were connected to the (layer=-1) bank.

I've corrected several more highway problems as shown in the warnings above.

More duplicated highways.

Hi, I've joined several highways that you mapped as crossing each other without joining.

Now make that 2 duplicated section of highway removed.

Hi, Please note and if possible correct the warnings given above. I've removed 1 duplicated section of highway that disrupted routing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your mapping was not quite what is expected for the OSM database, but is was a try. I've got all the original tagging back so no harm done. I've mapped the business, as per your tags, as a node by Coya on Throgmorton Street. This is where I approximated the position to be.

Hope this is OK, Regards Bernard.

No response so I've reverted the changeset.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I think you've incorrectly placed the POI, it's in Stevenage not Hitchin.

If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please take care not to make duplicated sections of a highway as this can disrupt routing. The warnings are given above. I've removed a duplicated section.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please take care not to make duplicated sections of a highway as this can disrupt routing. The warnings are given above. I've removed a duplicated section.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please take care not to make duplicated sections of a highway as this can disrupt routing. The warnings are given above. I've removed a duplicated section.

Regards Bernard.

Hi hypamaps,

Please look back to your changeset:- changeset/153295971

I could find no evidence of these 24 new paths nor their name. There was no reference that I could find on the Guilfest website. Further these paths in part were self intersecting and often the paths crossed with no joining node. So I reverted the changeset.

I apologise that the comment I attempted to make on that changeset did not go through.

Features made to OSM must be verifiable as per the advice given at:- osm.wiki/Verifiability

Regards Bernard

Hi julcnx, This person has some history of adding fiction, they added similar footpaths in the UK which have been reverted.

Regards Bernard.

Hi rskedgell,
I did comment to that effect on their changeset, maybe they'll have a go at me.

regards Bernard.

Hi, There is no need or logic to tag the canopy of a single tree as a wood. You've already mapped the single trees.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Tagged as such OSM has no logical idea what this feature is, if indeed it is a feature. If it is a verifiable, on-the-ground feature it needs more definition tags. What is it?

It should be removed if it's not verifiable as per this page:- osm.wiki/Verifiability.

Regards Bernard.