Apologies. How should this be fixed?

the postal code tag seems (in the US) designed for the main five-digit ZIP; I wanted to put the +4 elsewhere for safekeeping.

do you have software that tells you about new rare key uses?

There's art of a lizard painted (or otherwise marked, I only have aerials to go off) on the pavement there. I didn't know what tagging to use so I just went with area=yes at first, but iD complained so I added the other tag. Alternately, it's a defacto access tag indicating that lizards might be found there from time to time. Feel free to change it.

Out of curiosity, what kind of fixes were needed?

It's less about the hydrology and more about the topology.

Traversable ways (such as a trail, path, or road) and waterways (including intermittent ones, even if 'intermittent' means 'only wet in 100-year floods, if that') crossing each other needs one of: a ford if they cross at the same elevation, a culvert for the waterway or bridge for the path if the waterway goes under the path, or an aqueduct if the path goes under the waterway.

QA tools look for these tags / geometry. Such tools can of course be ignored, but the truth is that the on-the-ground situation will be one of those three (with the exception of arroyos/wadis that are themselves used as paths for longer stretches than a crossing takes, a situation which most OSM tooling doesn't currently handle well although there have been efforts to improve that), and it's not worth adding chaff to QA reports if it can be avoided.

Thanks for the question, and if you have any followups please feel free to continue asking / suggesting and I'll do my best to help constructively.

Oh no, munged the name of the hotel when merging duplicate area and point...will fix later if someone else doesn't first, have to run right now though.

updated.

These things: https://pceasy.com/Images%20for%20Individual%20Pages/Flat%20Stan/Flat%20Stan%201/Taking%20a%20Ride%20in%20the%20Pneumatic%20Tube%20at%20the%20Bank.JPG I just made an edit (/changeset/106367176) that may perhaps be a little more semantic. I don't think there is a well-accepted tag for this feature yet, however, so it's a case of fallback to ATYL.

>4 websites can't be wrong

They can be if they merely copy from each other.
In this case, addr:state isn't the only addr: tag that seems to be mistaken; where does the :housenumber originate from?

Well, I did so. If you need it in `name` for some reason you can change it back, but that's not the usual practice. If you see this and want to meet some of the frequent contributors to OSM in NM, you can visit the #local-newmexico channel in https://slack.openstreetmap.us; cheers!

Thank you for this lovely contribution! Do you mind if I move some of your `name` tags to `species` or `taxon` tags (osm.wiki/wiki/key:species) ?

Hi! Welcome to OSM, I see you're already familiar with HOT :)

Thanks for adding some Arroyo Seco buildings, I was inspired to add a few more. Let me know if you see something I did that might be improved, also.

There's an NM OSMers chat in the #local-newmexico channel at https://slack.openstreetmap.us if you're interested; there'll be a video meetup on Wednesday.

Hi! Welcome to OSM!

I changed the URL of your homepage from the http:// version to the https:// one since the first one didn't seem to work.

I'll definitely grab a growler next time I'm in town! 👀 In the meantime if you have any questions about OSM, the local community hangs out in the #local-newmexico channel on https://slack.openstreetmap.us; thanks for contributing to the map.

Just #local-newmexico, although tossing another hyphen in there might not be a bad idea...

Hi! Have you considered joining the Openstreetmap U.S. Slack? (https://slack.openstreetmap.us)

What sort of a direct contact are you looking for? This is a community project mostly made up of volunteers. Our main priority is representing ground truth, and we would be happy to put in a reasonable amount of labour to assist in implementing that, and appreciate perspective you can give us on the fine points of the on-site arrangement (such as spaces being reserved), but you must understand that no one entity can 'own' a given part of the map, even if they legally own the corresponding real-life property. The map is a public good, or to look at it another way providing a public service. For example, it would probably help your residents to have an accurate map of their neighborhood.

Judging from the website it's a print shop. Updated.

Hi! Thanks for editing the map, but the road shouldn't strictly follow the centerline, that's the job for osm.wiki/wiki/key:road_marking and it can add bends in the road that are not actually there in real life when a lane joins or leaves the road. Other than that, good work!

You should be careful that tunnels get added to the right way: way/785725983

I wonder if we should have a #geohashing changeset hashtag...