OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Andrew Chadwick's Notes

Notes submitted or commented on by Andrew Chadwick

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
108102 Andrew Chadwick

Missing speed limit

http://www.itoworld.com/map/124?lon=-1.21748&lat=51.74922&zoom=15&fullscreen=true&fullscreen=true

108101 Andrew Chadwick

Missing speed limit

http://www.itoworld.com/map/124?lon=-1.21748&lat=51.74922&zoom=15&fullscreen=true&fullscreen=true

2986355 rising-mistake

Double check addressing of Croft Close

2739883 rising-mistake

Couldn't see address of this house on survey

2979959 rising-mistake

couldn't read address of this house on survey

2609112 rising-mistake

Could not see address of this house during my survey

2609113 rising-mistake

Couldn't see address of this during survey

108096 Andrew Chadwick

Side roads needing speed limits

http://www.itoworld.com/map/124?lon=-1.21748&lat=51.74922&zoom=15&fullscreen=true&fullscreen=true

3722742 Andrew Chadwick

Other than the traffic islands, the London Place section only uses paint. There is no central vehicular barrier (will check).

"""
Roads are not to be mapped as dual carriageways if the two directions are only separated

* by paint. This includes single or multiple painted centre lines[1], hatched areas, channelized turn lanes[2], two-way turn lanes[2],
* by flush medians[3],
* or by any other means that is not a physical barrier to vehicles.
""" -- osm.wiki/Dual_carriageway

There may be a section it's reasonable to map as a short D.C. section to the NE of the Marston Rd traffic lights, but it's quite short. Is it worth it?

It's wide-sh, so an area:highway could be applicable for the micro shape mapping?

2941318 CycleStreets

Is this tiny stretch really a bridleway?