Beechwood House has flats(?) 1 thru 7

via StreetComplete 57.1

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/205906.jpg
https://westnordost.de/p/205907.jpg

Since each of these interpolations is only 2 or 3 addresses long, it might be less confusing for humans to represent them with commas, e.g. 78,82,86 or 58,62.

Or at worst, 2 or 3 "even" interpolation lines, using one per building level I'm guessing. Right now they're a little inscrutible when looking at the map even if they're correct!

I'd like to tag the entrances to each building or staircase too, while I'm at it. That tends to work well with flats.

Tagging more simply and typically might be more useful for data consumers too. Even OSM Inspector (!) gets confused by the addr:interpolation=4 notation. The wiki calls it an "unusual case", and I can see why, but it does document it.

Would be good to represent any cycleway exception to the left turn only restriction using a separate geometry instead of cycleway=track, now that we're doing kerb-separated cycleways as separate highway=cycleway [+ cycleway=sidewalk if appropriate]. Even if this is just a cycleway=link, the oneway bit for cars would be able to better represent the turn into the Keep Clear

Satellite view is ambiguous - can't tell if there's a dropped kerb to facilitate this, or whether such a bike/scooter/whatever link and crossing really exists. Nees on on-the-ground survey to decide.

this greenery has a different shape now

Is the little building=yes to the W of the car park / turning circle "The Studio" instead of the main L-shaped one?

This is development is now completed and walkable, with some sort of mews area of housing going on further along the alleyway