Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps the map even more accurate.

A few friendly suggestions: • Focus edits within a small geographical area (like a single city, district, or province) • Try not to mix far-apart locations in one changeset • Save/upload before starting work in a totally different area

If you’re curious, the wiki explains more here: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks again for your mapping energy, and happy mapping! 🗺️

Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps the map even more accurate.

A few friendly suggestions: • Focus edits within a small geographical area (like a single city, district, or province) • Try not to mix far-apart locations in one changeset • Save/upload before starting work in a totally different area

If you’re curious, the wiki explains more here: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks again for your mapping energy, and happy mapping! 🗺️

Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps the map even more accurate.

A few friendly suggestions:
• Focus edits within a small geographical area (like a single city, district, or province)
• Try not to mix far-apart locations in one changeset
• Save/upload before starting work in a totally different area

If you’re curious, the wiki explains more here: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks again for your mapping energy, and happy mapping! 🗺️

Ciao, grazie per il tuo primo contributo e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap; se sei interessato ti invito ad entrare nel canale telegram italiano per poterti confrontare, quando hai dubbi, con la community italiana. 😉

Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps the map even more accurate.

A few friendly suggestions: • Focus edits within a small geographical area (like a single city, district, or province) • Try not to mix far-apart locations in one changeset • Save/upload before starting work in a totally different area

If you’re curious, the wiki explains more here: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks again for your mapping energy, and happy mapping! 🗺️

Why is it important to remind both new and experienced users to keep changesets limited to a specific area? First of all, not all editors can handle loading large amounts of data, as happens with iD (link). More importantly, a large bounding box (covering, for example, half the world or all of Northern Italy) makes it harder for other mappers—both local and remote—to review the changes, even when using modern tools like Better OSM or OsmCha.

I agree with you that the wiki doesn’t specify any strict rule about changeset size. In my view, the main issue with your changeset wasn’t the number of edits, but that it included modifications in two different cities (and provinces).

I’m not sure who complained about too many small changesets, but personally I think it’s better to keep one changeset per city, even if it contains a lot of edits. In your case, the cities aren’t very large, so a changeset like yours wouldn’t be too big or too small, it seems perfectly acceptable, even if it modifies all the websites at once. For larger cities, I might split it into smaller changesets, though.

Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps the map even more accurate.

It would be helpful to provide a more detailed description of your changeset. This makes it easier for other mappers to review and verify your work. 😉

A few friendly suggestions: • Focus edits within a small geographical area (like a single city, district, or province) • Try not to mix far-apart locations in one changeset • Save/upload before starting work in a totally different area

If you’re curious, the wiki explains more here: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks again for your mapping energy, and happy mapping! 🗺️

Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps the map even more accurate.

A few friendly suggestions: • Focus edits within a small geographical area (like a single city, district, or province) • Try not to mix far-apart locations in one changeset • Save/upload before starting work in a totally different area

If you’re curious, the wiki explains more here: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks again for your mapping energy, and happy mapping! 🗺️

IT
Ciao! Grazie per il contributo! 🌟

Un piccolo consiglio: sarebbe meglio concentrare le modifiche su un’area geografica più ristretta, come Schio o Castelfranco, invece di mescolare luoghi lontani nello stesso changeset. Questo aiuta a evitare conflitti, facilita la revisione da parte di altri mappatori e mantiene la mappa più precisa.

Dal momento che si tratta di un bot, potresti considerare di regolarne le impostazioni in modo che divida le modifiche per area, così ogni changeset resta locale e più facile da gestire.

Per approfondire: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Grazie ancora per l’energia nella mappatura e buon mapping! 🗺️
--------------
EN

Hi there, and thanks for your contribution! 🌟

Just a friendly tip: it would be better if edits were focused on a smaller geographic area, like Schio or Castelfranco, rather than mixing distant locations in the same changeset. This helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps the map accurate.

Since this seems to be a bot, you might consider adjusting its settings to split edits by area, so each changeset stays local and easier to manage.

For more info: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks again for your mapping energy, and happy mapping! 🗺️

EN

Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟
Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps the map even more accurate.

A few friendly suggestions:
• Focus edits within a small geographical area (like a single city, district, or province)
• Try not to mix far-apart locations in one changeset
• Save/upload before starting work in a totally different area

If you’re curious, the wiki explains more here: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks again for your mapping energy, and happy mapping! 🗺️

EN

Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps the map even more accurate.

A few friendly suggestions: • Focus edits within a small geographical area (like a single city, district, or province) • Try not to mix far-apart locations in one changeset • Save/upload before starting work in a totally different area

If you’re curious, the wiki explains more here: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks again for your mapping energy, and happy mapping! 🗺️

Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas. 😉osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170231023

Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas. 😉osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170282495

Ciao perché hai eliminato questi tag? in base a cosa?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170123663

Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas. 😉osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170076780

Ciao, qui avresti dovuto fare più changeset, i punti sono molto lontani fra di loro
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170036142

ciao, qui sarebbe stato meglio fare 2 changesets
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170036084

Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas. 😉osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169994867

Hi, thanks for your contribution, but be careful, you have edited things in Thailand and things in the USA. So your Changeset area is huge and doesn't follow the guidelines 😊osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169925973

@Le_Sharkoïste
Your continued sarcastic replies make it clear you're not interested in discussing mapping guidelines, but only in provoking.

I won’t engage further here, but I want it to be on record that I tried to explain myself clearly and respectfully.

Mocking other mappers for following OSM documentation helps no one.