Source, which aerial photo is this?
How actual is this one? I know only Bing and Cyclomedia (license) to use.

Astonished, today, tages like this,
mee=DRIE
waterway=ditch
from a import, after all the commotion on the forum.
Astonished, today, tages like this,
mee=DRIE
waterway=ditch
After all the commotion in the forum.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=615968#p615968

First there was also natural=water on it, skipped it, so now there is only waterway=ditch on it, on a polygon, a waterway gives a stream line, this can not on a polygon. Earlier part of a import, but this done during after a keepright session.

grass=forest
Where did you get this tag combination.

Parking is controlled by access key and not by name, there is not a sign with this name, Parkeren School, as example, there more and this name is not in the source data of the import. You only take the name key to get it visible on www.openstreetmap.org/ map, this is a abuse of the name key. Probably also this way of tagging is other changesets.

Import: Do you ever use JOSM validation, today uploads, all crossing ways and overlapping ways and more on your own uploaded data.

Why????, you took of natural=water on a polygon, waterway is for a line feature.
But you import polygons.
natural=water water=ditch
This was told several time in the forum!!
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=614227#p614227

Import, unteachable, there is arbitrary line in your process. when I see such tags. pollution the database.
SHAPE_Area 35321.5061334
SHAPE_Leng 1264.64335154
landuse landuse>grass
status nov_2016
tekst Plantcover

Earlier told on forum that a natural=water needs a water=*
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=614227#p614227
Also now there is a natural=water inside a natural=water, with no relation on it outer inner. This all part of a import.

You was told on forum to tag key waterway not on polygon and what did you today.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=614275#p614275
And this a part of a import.

Yesterday you was told embankment on lines, today you tag it on polygon.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=614293#p614293

What is mentioned a long time ago https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606573#p606573
About routing and tagging polygons and highway=* and area=yes and then you make besides roadgrass_paver routable, where is this import documented.

What is mentioned a long time ago https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606573#p606573
About routing and tagging polygons and highway=* and area=yes

What is this for a landuse=residential tag?
Where documented?

Are these embankment tages discussed with the forum, the conversion from your source tags to osm tags. waterway on a polygon, missing water, Do you have a conversion tag plan?
Again, where is it documented.

Where is the source documented?
Where is the conversion explained?
natural=water within a natural=water, then combined with a waterway=ditch.
The purpose of the so called waterway=dam is to hold water. Here it is a culvert to let the water flow further.
The conversion choices are not documented or discussed with the community.

This is wrong. Basic rule OSM. Do not tag for the render.
Only 1 node allowed on a ford, better to use only on a way, is describes the situation better, you see also how long a ford is. A better gps or application could understand the data. Such things should be solved in GPS or application.

The fords, where on the way, before then you do not make, fords on node!!

Vragen zie Dankelman forumdeel.

According SV, it is not forbidden for motorcycle moped and mofa. If the situation is true, then =yes on barrier
use incline
incline=*