Thanks for updating the map. Nice work.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79576996

Nice. I love it when folks correct the boundaries by adjusting them to the MassGIS L3 Parcels layer. I assume that was your process.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79178669

Nice to have identified the pool. II changed tags from natural=water to leisure=swimming_pool. This is a pretty common issue for new users. Keep mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79178561

There has been no change to the refuge name according to the refuge manager
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79271628

Interesting. Could you site some federal legislation that renamed this section of the refuge. I couldn't find anything on google.

Interesting. Whats on the ground is a line of about 15 boulders creating a wall with a space for pedestrians on the east side. The road is none existent. I re-mapped the area with a path, the sidewalk connections, fire hydrant and bike rack.

I added driveway stubs at both ends of your un mapped driveway. That should be enough to let Amazon find your house. It's not right for a map to cause you grief. Living near Boston, the worst congested city in the US causes a lot of people to seek a short cuts and your driveway is a huge short cut.

Welcome to OSM. Amazon has added a lot of driveways to help their drivers make delivery. You could add access=private if you'd like to reinstate your driveway. No router will send cars down your driveway.

Hi William, Thanks for taking a stab at the continuation of the BFT but I don't think just adding it to the RR is correct. There's a mess of abandoned railroads in W Concord and sections of the BFT adjacent to the old RR. At least part of the BFT doesn't follow the RR where it jogs thru W Concord. That section, at least, should be removed from the RR relation. (I think?)

Instead of removing a path, consider adding an access=no or private or permissive. All trails do not have to be access=yes. The main OSM objective is to map whatever can be seen on the ground.

Nice change. Keeping the map up to date.

Hi, The work you did mapping the mall is really impressive. I changed the sections that had "levels" from building=yes to building:part=yes , That seems to eliminate overlapping building QC warnings. I'm not 100% sure that's the right thing to do. The "Cycle Map" layer at osm.org shows buildings in 3D.

Hi, Nice work. I've been doing the same thing in other parts of the state and noticed your work. I've been using http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr and checkmark objects overlap under the building topic.

Nice job adding house numbers. I removed old misleading data. Looks great.

Thanks. It's been corrected now. We have a spaghetti bowl of sloppy polygons that were imported 10 years ago for landuse=reservoir_watershed used only in Massachusetts. Makes mapping very difficult..

Thanks for catching that. I missed a step in a manual processs.
Alan

Thanks once again. This is embarrassing. The stragglers have been fixed.

The changes resulted from investigating orphan ways http://osmoscope.jochentopf.com

Are these untagged ways mtb trails?

Changed address for parking lot at end of street from Billing to Billings